Do not Draw a Penis
donotdrawapenis.com
donotdrawapenis.com
I honestly don't understand what this is. Is it a trick to see if I actually will draw a penis (reverse psychology)? How does it recognize an elephant? Why did it erase my elephant? What is it blathering on about?
"Do not draw a penis?
In 2018 Google open-sourced the Quickdraw data set. “The world's largest doodling data set”. The set consists of 345 categories and over 15 million drawings. For obvious reasons the data set was missing a few specific categories that people enjoy drawing. This made us at Moniker think about the moral reality big tech companies are imposing on our global community and that most people willingly accept this. Therefore we decided to publish an appendix to the Google Quickdraw data set.
Do Not Draw a Penis functions as an agent to collect inappropriate doodles from people who are not willing to stay within the moral guidelines set by our social network providers.
So far we have collected 10K doodles formatted the same way as Google's dataset. We are happy to announce you can download them here."
Phrasing!
It has, indeed. Oftentimes, these systems get trained with people with very fundamental religious beliefs in the Philippines [1].
[1]: https://www.wired.com/2014/10/content-moderation/
[2]: https://www.abc.net.au/news/science/2018-09-29/the-cleaners-... (full story)
Did you know that in German speaking countries we never hear Arnolds original voice? He is dubbed by a German actor in all of his movies. So it remains a mystery...
For all the Austrians in the thread: Yes, I know he is Austrian an technically his accent is Austrian.
> Do Not Draw a Penis functions as an agent to collect inappropriate doodles from people who are not willing to stay within the moral guidelines set by our social network providers.
This is similar to how there are emoji for eyes, hands, feet, hearts, anatomical hearts, lungs, ears, etc.
But not a single emoji about genitals. Not even boobs.
Gasp! I just learned the phallus heiroglyphs are missing from the fonts on my windows box! Even U+130B8 𓂸 which isn't even a penis, it's just a somewhat phallic finger.
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Breast_(hierogly...
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Phallus_(hierogl...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Egyptian_Hieroglyphs_(Unicode_...
Hmm, but it does looks like a whole penis and scrotum in my browser (firefox on mac).
When creating this collection, they missed a lot of stuff. It was never intended to be a complete set of all symbols that a human might need. Some guy at some phone company just made them. The attempts to add a handful of new characters with each new Unicode version don't improve much.
People seem to be using the eggplant emoji as a standin for a penis. It gets the message across, apparently.
I'll observe tangentially that the Chinese term is 表情, "emotion indicator".
That's debatable.
Person 1: I just lost my job.
Person 2: :(So, basically protestant puritanism?
Edit: US based companies appear to me to at least as concerned with new markets than existing markers. In some cases, China and the middle east are the regions which motivate 'puritanical' discretion, not the US.
Yes, because none of the things on that list have ever been sexualized before.
Nope, none of them.
I drew multiple penises and it didn't erase, praised them.
Broken! How would I live without a neural network stopping me from being immoral?
Does this mean my drawing is already logged and studied?
I'm not sure if I was more disappointed at my drawing being so bad that the AI couldn't figure it out, or that it missed a blatant opportunity to say, "nice hooters you go there."
You mean it said, "wow that's kinda small?"
Meanwhile, _this_ got let through, and I promise I started with the dong (which it called a paintbrush). https://imgur.com/a/u4ARqRD (nsfw)
Thank you for the daily reminder of the dystopia we presently live in, AI researchers and developers. I for one, welcome our AI overlords.
I was very surprised at pinnochio. It had two eyes and a nose and a big smile. Yet the AI saw something completely different.
https://maremma-tuscany.com/massa-marittima/albero-della-fec...
https://www.threemonkeysonline.com/from-fertility-symbol-to-...
Like, the way the phalluses (phalli? Huh, apparently "phalli" is the one Firefox's spellcheck recognizes) look like they're thinly painted on top of what look like normal fruit, with a different paint that appears to have faded faster than the original, strongly suggests the fresco was not originally painted with such phallic abundance. Seems like some prankster took some paint and "improved" it, possibly with his medieval buddies for a laugh.
Another tell-tale sign of this being ancient vandalism is the missing spots (both in the boughs and among the women on the ground), as if a caretaker desperately tried to scrub off the penises until, realizing such efforts were scrubbing away the original, gave up in frustration.
Even if the other stuff you draw is just a random line segment a bit close to the actual picture.
How is it look like? I tried drawing ╰⋃╯ and it seem to detect it.
Kilroy was here.
I'm ashamed to admit I've spent an hour on this site...
"Do Not Draw a Penis functions as an agent to collect inappropriate doodles from people who are not willing to stay within the moral guidelines set by our social network providers.
So far we have collected 10K doodles formatted the same way as Google's dataset. We are happy to announce you can download them ↘ here."
Ouch.
You’ve been warned. (Use headphones)
Here's a good start for your customer base.
https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/j5zywd/meet-dick-run-clai...
if anyone wants to do this - email is in the profile.
There aren't many datasets for vagina drawings from quick search. Nothing much pops up on github either. I haven't seen many people draw them. Penis and boobs are common in school and online spaces. I observed this to be the same for both genders.
What gives?
I am not sure if line complexity has to do with it. [0] looks more or less the same amount if you simplify. Of course with simplification, it's less observable or clear.
1. https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn%3AANd9GcRl0Q...
So I tried drawing both of them a few times, I think vaginas are harder to draw because they require to be more symmetric than a penis. It's more to do with how your wrist works while working in the opposite direction.
Because female sexual organs are a taboo in most countries. I just happened to read this article (sorry, in German only) https://www.spiegel.de/gesundheit/sex/klitoris-und-weibliche... Like you, more than 70% of women don't even know that the thing you are referring to is called vulva, not vagina. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vulva
You draw a penis, not an urethra after all.
Still there are differences from country to country. When I moved from Germany to Finland decades ago I wondered about a certain pattern of symbolic graffiti seen in many places. My girlfriend explained me that's a vagina. (With today's knowledge she meant vulva). I had never seen that symbol in Germany. But then Finland is the country where the most common swear word is cunt, even amongst 14 year old girls.
The doodle is usually called kirkkovene ("church boat"). https://www.google.com/search?tbm=isch&q=kirkkovene&tbs=imgo...
(Screenshot, in case Google doesn't give the right results for all users: https://i.imgur.com/HASrhyr.png)
Thanks for sharing the article. It does seem like female reproductive organs being taboo is the main reason behind lack of their depiction.
Typically a penis and testicles, going by this thread. But the title still says penis.
A medical definition does not overrule a colloquial one.
According to the works of Camille Paglia, the reason we have female strippers but male strippers aren't so much a thing (and she was writing some time ago, so times have changed somewhat) is because after a female stripper has taken everything off, her genitals remain hidden. Not so with a man.
There are some inherent challenges to depicting the vagina. It's hard to put on display "normally." It isn't on display merely because you are standing there naked like with a penis.
/2 cents
The voice prompts were a little annoying. Are you supposed to try to draw a penis to make it say something?
...but the title said do not draw "a" penis. It did not say "don't draw muliple penises"...
Story checks out?
(Warning, NSFW): https://imgur.com/UqabKL8 https://imgur.com/6pEtsPU
It definitely leaned into it.
This, as a machine-generated response to someone doodling comes across at once as naive as well as somewhat intimidating :P "Okay mommy, won't draw penis, but can I at least draw a few random lines and dots?"
AI is going to eat the world, IMHO, and we've just started up the exponential curve in the past two decades. Huge potential to appear REALLY intelligent.
Contrast to this fairly broad stated goal, it is very single minded. I'll grant that the vulva I drew was probably hard to make out (still though - "asparagus"?), but the boobs? They should have been easily distinguishable from a "stereo".
https://l.sr.ht/skBo.png https://l.sr.ht/dKWH.png (NSFW?)
Though that could be down to my artistic skill.
The lady keeps warning and erasing your work if you try to draw penises.
However, after a while she seems to had enough, the lady goes furious and cursing, and she keeps drawing hundreds of penises for you.
Now, here's a challenge: try to draw an airplane that doesn't get recognised as a penis!
Interesting project, is there a way to assist it in training I didn't find on the interface to tell it I played tic-tac-toe?
It didn't recognize this beauty: https://imgur.com/a/iTYAry9
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ACmydtFDTGs
was
I prefer this drawing pad :)
I'm making a note here - huge success.
Since Moniker made the dataset open on GitHub you're free to try your luck! Above link is a pretty good implementation.
It did, however, immediately recognize the fattest chode I've ever had the pleasure of drawing.
One of the creators here: we were very much caught by surprise by the sudden interest in this project. (A year after launch) We are currently counting stock and updating our shop for a better experience (like not defaulting to an out of stock color for a product)
No, it does not.
Yessss... Trombone...
Bush detection, check!
:(
Dang, please have this removed!
Where's Dang?
My contribution. This rather severe depiction managed to fly under the radar. The AI was even kind enough to heap praise upon my illustration.
The Internet was a mistake.
:p But yeah, I agree the prompts are irritating. I was confused as to the 'objective', to be honest.