Vice Media Lays Off 155 Employees with Deepest Cuts in Digital Group
variety.com
variety.com
I certainly wondered if after the controversial albeit effective founder (Gaven McInnes) leaving/the firm going public, it was only a matter of time. Perhaps so.
The racist, mysogynist cofounder is gunna be a hard thing for me to forget when I think about Vice going forward.
This isn't a question I was trying to answer, and I don't believe the two are mutually exclusive. My only point is that Vice changed from being some free crap you picked up at American Apparel which most popular part was shaming people's fashion style, to what it is today. How did American Apparel get so large (and where are they now?)? All they did was sell very expensive t-shirts. My guess is fashion trends and marketing - much of that marketing done by, sigh another fairly controversial figure.
https://www.theguardian.com/fashion/2013/nov/18/terry-richar...
Perhaps making fun of people = visitors = website clicks (as their was an online version of this as well) = advertising moneys. I dunno. Someone saw value in that, and trusted this particular person. I could opt that successful businesses with little real worth are built with the hands of sociopaths (but I'm going that far).
I like to think it’s because society at-large has improved - otherwise PeopleOfWalmart and other websites of its ilk would still be relevant.
Definitely.
Not to derail this thread too much, but I think that one is potentially even more insidious because it's much more spiritually authoritarian and panoptical. But that one too is beginning to elicit fatigue, especially with corporate sponsors that for a while had been attempting to subsume it into a third position that they now believe may have become [1] untenable.
I guess the question is, what's next?
[1]https://www.businessinsider.com/google-cut-diversity-program...
Afterwards, the company went straight to shit. Now, we're blessed with quality articles such as: 1)"Nintendo Switch's Joy-con Sync issue is Even worse if you put it in your butt" 2)"Three days of torture in a male chastity device" 3)"How to pick a chastity cage lock with a condom wrapper" 4)"Finally, a new emoji to mock men"
I will be celebrating when Vice (along with BuzzFeed and Vox) file for bankruptcy.
There is Deadspin in the Gawker portfolio which I think was a great example of the natural maturation you are talking about. The style of the site and what they covered definitely matured over the years, but that same defiant ethos stuck around until and was perhaps defined by the very the moment the entire team mass resigned in response to mismanagement. And it is interesting to note that multiple writers who resigned from Deadspin ended up at Vice.
Peter Thiel had used pictures of himself shirtless on a gay cruise as his profile on some social media. To consider that his privacy was invaded because he may not have specifically said the precise words "I am gay" is disingenuous. Not to mention, courts have repeatedly held that billionaires are considered "public figures" by virtue of their "outsized influence and impact on public affairs".
There's a reason Gawker was never successfully sued by Thiel.
Gawker and Hogan _had_ also settled before Thiel got involved. Hogan had settled with the other party, the one who _sold_ the tape, for 0.02% of the claim against Gawker.
Isn't another of the tenets of a justice system the right to face your accuser, not have someone Wizard of Oz behind the scenes bankrolling things because of their own vendetta?
I can dislike Gawker (TMZ, et al) and still see huge flaws in how this all went down.
You communicated it better than I. I was somewhat horrified with the outcome because I (perhaps naively) had some belief that this tenet of the justice system had not yet been compromised. But the old adage that we have N justice systems for N wealth buckets (where N in {[rich, poor], [1%, 99%], ...}) seems to be true.
I wouldn't take back the claim, but I would chuckle a bit.
The plural of data is not necessarily a narrative. I would ask you to try again, this time without deliberately ignoring the thread and misreading it.
Now? Yeah, I wouldn't call them counter-cultural anymore.
In other words, I believe they are in decline because they are trying to be "woke". and as they say when you go woke you go broke.
That is hardly a countercultral media outlet position nowadays
The irony here is that vice, huffpo, buzzfeed, etc demanded social media censor fringe "alt-right" media and start favoring more established media. They got their wish. Now google, youtube, facebook, etc heavily favors CNN, MSNBC, Foxnews, NYTimes, WaPo, etc. It still shocks me how oblivious these people were. They depended entirely on social media providing an equal playing field to everyone. And yet, they were the ones demanding social media companies play favorites.
At this point, what is there but to just laugh at them. Nobody should feel sorry for these people/companies as they got what they asked for. Censorship and favoritism. The funny thing is that most likely the alt-right media will outlast vice, huffpo, buzzfeed, etc.
I'd be interested to see examples though if you have them.
Vice media used to be about cutting-edge reporting and has devolved to fluff pieces centered around a progressive agenda.
Spoiler: She didn't cry after shooting a firearm.
For example, video game sales have had a really great last quarter.
People may read more during the pandemic, but the advertisers are advertising less:
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-vice-m...:
> Vice Media lays off 155 employees as coronavirus pandemic wipes out ad revenue
> ...The cuts come as the news media industry suffers from an epic drop in advertising revenue as companies cut spending amid the pandemic.
> Digital media companies, including Quartz and Buzzfeed, have slashed jobs, furloughed employees and cut salaries in an effort to survive the outbreak.
10% cut before pandemic (Feb): https://variety.com/2019/digital/news/vice-media-layoffs-250...
Vice cancelled from HBO: https://www.businessinsider.com/hbo-canceled-vice-news-tonig...
More cuts (Nov): https://www.wsj.com/articles/vice-media-to-shrink-workforce-...
Many of the famous projects at vice, featuring war coverage, projects involving psychedelics and cutting edge mental health treatment among a few, are not nearly as prevalent now. Further many of the arguably top journalists to join in Vice’s history have gone (many, but not all)
These projects are why I started reading/watching Vice in the first place.
I think the pandemic is going to be used by companies like Vice as an excuse for a failing business model.
As already mentioned, they were going out of business long before the pandemic. The Pandemic is just an excuse for their failures.
There are so many news sites dedicated to progressive content that Vice turned into. They lost their edge, competitive advantage, and I would imagine, most of their viewer base. This is why they failed.
Unlike Vice they might actually be fine though, because I think Vox's readers seek out that far left bias, whereas Vice's customers were more mixed. That said, I am largely basing this based on my anecdotal experience and speculating about the overall readership of these publications.
This journalist has had it out for comedy that he finds funny or offensive.
https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/av4z45/the-bill-and-ted-s...
Vice was never anything more than editorialized content pushing some agenda. Way early on they had some interesting stuff like the inside North Korea videos, but those days are long gone.
Edit: Yes I'm still bitter over Bill and Ted being cancelled.
This is the hole all the big news and media houses fell into.
I don't think a lot of these companies really understood what the transaction they were making when they pivoted or expanded. When an outlet like Vice peddles fluff, click-bait and controversy pieces, the transaction is not videos/articles for clicks.
With those fluff pieces, Vice and others were trading away trust and reputation, which is the core product of any information business. In a time where truth and trust are desperately needed, the big media houses should have been making bank (My god, in the information age, why can't the original information businesses make money?).
Instead they bankrupted their core product for quick cash because they accidentally equated their product (Trust) with what they were selling (advertisements), and that lowered the whole industry to the point where they have to share space with the likes of Infowars.
And for the bulk of these laid off folks, this will likely mean their time in journalism is done. The odds of there being many opportunities in the industry after the pandemic seem pretty low right now..
> “everyone will be able to keep their work-issued laptops”
They could have ordered the laid off employees to destroy their laptops.
Even for high-value hardware that might have been financially worth reclaiming at the end of someone's employment, there was always a buyout clause in their hardware issuance agreement and we encouraged people to use it if they liked their laptop. We _really_ didn't want the gear back most of the time.
A lot longer than any media outlet.
The market probably also thinks that a good chunk of the additional consumer use can be captured by google and fb post-covid.
If you think the same for click bait media companies they would be a great buy. Actual reader demand is through the roof - they just aren’t readers who are willing to buy anything.
For every vertical that went down (ie, mortgages, local small business ads) there's plenty of others that go up (ie, health insurance, consumer ecommerce).
I don't think media buys on newspapers are a significant amount of Google et al's ad business, adwords (ie, search based ads) is much bigger than adsense (display advertising). Search for any major keyword and you'll still find the SERP flooded with ad results. I'd imagine generally it's gone down for Google but I doubt it's by much total.
Yet the market just doesn't show it. And I've seen no good explanations.
For myself, btw: I'm mostly in bond funds and cash accounts at this point. There just has to be another severe crash coming in the next few months.
I have rotated half into Gold ETFs and the rest into cash for the next few months to do some bearish options trading.
I know large chain retailers who have laid off all retail staff and only kept operations, marketing and digital, so this doesn't register as a big story. That something to do with Vice isn't really news is perhaps par for the course, but as the shutdown progresses, there could be waves of layoffs like this to show a bump in their Q3 results.