Hacker News Reader

Comment by toomuchtodo | Hacker News Reader

The collateral damage is immense, to both gig workers and in the case of food delivery, restaurants who do the actual work of making the food.

EDIT: I mean, just go UBI instead of advocating for siphoning sovereign fund dollars from ruthless dictators and unsophisticated investors like Masayoshi Son. Save us all the paperwork and bikeshedding about not being able to afford what we clearly (based on central bank monetary policy) can afford. I will certainly miss the Matt Levine pieces about these folks though.

View on HN

How restaurants suffered? I mean if restaurants were so unable to cooperate to set up their own delivery service to compete against the VC funded ones, then they were already well destined to go out of business.

(And I'm not saying the state shouldn't step in, because these are the typical pathological market states that need some intervention.)

Delivery services have monopolized many peoples restaurant ordering habits. Many restaurants have their own delivery service, but people don't use it because they order from grubhub/doordash/uber eats instead. If the restaurants take themselves off the services people don't order from them anymore.

So it turns people value UX and simplicity than restaurant diversity. And I'm not exactly blaming them. Restaurants' own ordering/delivery systems all usually suck.

People value TV ads and newspaper articles/PR, and they value new things.

Is that really true everywhere?

Where I live, we have these services, but I don’t see huge push of Grubhub/DoorDash/Uber. If anything, restaurants are all setting up their own ordering platforms.

Nobody is forced to work for Uber and the like, restaurants can also ban these services.

This is a tired argument. We live in a society, not Somalia. Government exists to regulate to protect citizens, and I'm starting to believe these arguments are put forth to give these monstrosities more time before death gasps.

> not Somalia

I'm curious why you would choose this example. Is somalia a country without a society ?

This is laughable, since the government also created an artificial taxi monopoly that benefitted no one but a small subset of people.

Uber is a godsend to millions of people and drivers around the world, to say otherwise in order to drive your political agenda it’s akin to living under a rock.

And if you want some proof, just ask every Uber driver if they would be sad or happy if the service disappeared tomorrow and hear their answers. There is a world out there that lives and thrives thanks to companies like Uber.

Uber is artificially starving out the markets it enters by offering dumping prices. Restaurants are similarly dragged into participating at gunpoint (in particular, the likes of DoorDash, Yelp and GrubHub will absolutely hold the restaurant's reputation hostage until it joins the platform).

Wrong. Uber made the market bigger and a result to that there are more people overall working for the transportation industry. It’s not like every Uber driver would have been a taxi driver if Uber didn’t exist..

Of course it made the market bigger, because it forced the competitors to lower prices to unsustainable levels. Lower prices = more demand = more supply = bigger market. For now.

It's also true that the more fast neutrons hit your fissile matter, the more energy you can extract faster. Yet it doesn't make an atomic bomb work as a viable power source.

But doing so is a classic Prisoner's Dilemma in the short term - if you don't acquiesce to Uber Eats delivery fees, but your competitors do, who captures the market share? Even if it isn't fruitful for them in the long term, it shafts you in the short term.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com