For those who still want news, I think reuters provides the most balance. They do still lean left at times though with overuse of phrases like "far right".
I doubt this would be true for NYT, WaPo, etc., but I am indeed too lazy to look.
For those too young to remember what reasonable journalism used to look like, Reuters and AP are probably the closest, in the MSM.
How is that a good thing? "Far right" and "far left" are both perfectly fine terms to describe certain political ideologies and movements.
Or, to put it another way, if half of the electorate holds fairly similar views, they cannot reasonably be described as "far right" (or "far left", for that matter). The "far" end would be maybe one percent, not fifty.
In any case, I appreciate journalists that simply describe the situation, and allow me to decide for myself what I think about it. Hard to remember now, but that's how it actually used to be.