We ask police to deal with mobs of violent criminals then get angry at them when they push someone, it's laughable.
It's naive to expect perfect policing in such situations.
It's naive to expect perfect policing in such situations.
Your standards don’t seem consistent or reasonable.
Perfection.
Are safety and the right to peacefully assemble so at odds?
The national guard protecting the lives and rights of its citizens is a far cry from being dominated as a part of a battle space.
If we consider that there may be substance to other viewpoints as opposed to only opposition to our own we could work at addressing some of the root or common goals instead of focusing on division.
Why don’t states and or citizens feel comfortable utilizing the national guard?
Is it reasonable to fear an escalation which may place the American people and their constitutional rights in jeopardy?
Are there approaches that would deescalate the situation that should be favored over those which risk even greater division (in particular between the citizens and the military )?
Looters should be assaulted instead of arrested? Where is the due process?
People have been assaulted on their own porches, is any of this resolving the situation or escalating it at the cost of the rights and well being of the citizenry?