Humor me for applying some heuristics here. You're bringing up 43 year old studies and two decade out CIA reports as justification for the health risks of _extremely-widely used_ technology. Should I assume that this is the best we have on offer in studies of a systemic risk, or just cherry picking?

Also, why create a throwaway to post this stuff if you're stating an earnest and sincere belief? Surely credible views like these deserve to be held openly.