Zotero then has "right click -> extract notes", and you get the stuff you highlighted in a new document, with links back into the PDF.
That has completely turned around the experience of reading PDF textbooks for me, it's such a neat feature.
I occasionally scribble on PDFs using my reMarkable. But it's a bit too slow (eink) for my needs.
Tip: you actually don't need to install kde toolkit to be able to run Okular on Windows and macOS. Search for nightly builds - I'm on a nightly build and it's pretty solid.
I realized though that it might be due to the fact that we do so many things on the computer. I know how many websites are just a click away. It takes a certain mindset, but typically, after 10-15 minutes, I can focus enough on the materials that even the computer is fine.
It just takes practice and focus, the latter being increasingly scarce in today's world of notifications.
I wonder if this is something people of all age-groups universally feel, or do kids today have no problem grokking hardcore technical details from ebooks.
You might want to buy a cheap hot glue binding machine as well, or use the one at your local library or university.
Anyone here with experience with Remarkable? Maybe thats the answer?
Most of the time I still end up reading the digital copy on my Laptop, as I personally find this more comfortable for textbooks.
We still await a killer e-ink device to read them on - even the appropriately big-screen ones are still far too slow ux-wise - but even that would not quite be as good as having it to flip back and forth in your hands.
I think that's one of the important differences between textbooks and fiction or articles. The latter are normally a sequential read so a bog standard Kindle or equivalent is ideal for them; textbooks you need to be more interactive.
Tablets (ipads, etc) obviously have some of that, but have an inferior pure reading experience to e-ink/paper.
Still paper for me for textbooks as well.
With a book, it feels different when reading material at different places in the book. Even if I'm not going through the book linearly but instead looking up things in the index and jumping to them, I get a sense of where things are in space. Later, if I'm trying to find something again I can usually go to close to the right place without bothering with the index.
I suspect that the reason for this is is related to why/how the method of loci [1] (AKA memory palace) works. We are really good at remembering spatial relationships, and the book lets us tap into that.
This is not a problem! I also prefer dead trees, I just like the experience of holding and reading them. For technical books, a digital copy is useful also to find all occurrences of a word (especially on older books with incomplete indices).
(The UX of e-book readers may get there one day, but it's not there yet.)