Maybe don't make unsubstantiated claims without evidence.
Obviously non ethical hackers can get paid non ethically. Anyone can get paid non-ethically after all. It's a fact that's so trivial it's useless if you just take it for its factual content. What makes it interesting is the implication that people use hashcat for unethical (and/or illegal) activities and use the proceeds from that to pay for their time improving hashcat. The comment doesn't state that, but it's what we are all thinking when reading it.
The clear implication that actually answers the question, that these non ethical hackers are responsible for the commitment to the project, is an unsubstantiated claim.