Winamp’s woes: How the greatest MP3 player undid itself (2012)
arstechnica.com
arstechnica.com
And then, at some points, the UX completely changed. It also started being spammy. Almost like the project was sold to some incompetent people. Then I felt like it lost its magic. It also happened to be the time when streaming from Napster became possible and I completely switched to it.. and then to grooveshark/deezer/all-the-others.
Winamp could have been Spotify but went in a completely different directions. Saying that may sound crazy, but that's what Netflix did. It was selling/renting dvd, saw streaming coming and did a full 180.
Well AOL bought it ... Milking something as long as possible instead of innovating is kind of their thing.
iTunes on Windows used to be really great if you just wanted music. It used to be that iTunes was considered a Trojan horse to show Windows users how good Mac software was.
Amazing how times change.
Yes I remember that the first time I used streaming music it was shoutcast.
It was really fantastic with hundreds of different music channels and podcasts. One radio station I was particularly fond off was called Atlantic sound factory. They had a goldmine on their hands and it's a shame they let it all go to waste.
I've been a di.fm subscriber for a looooooong time now. :)
I'm not so sure how successful that really would have been. There is a significant gap between Winamp falling out of favor and the rise of Spotify. The obvious winner in that gap wasn't any streaming service, it was Apple. The gap is basically defined as the period between when the iPod became ubiquitous and when the iPhone became ubiquitous. Granted, there is a few year period between when the iPhone was released and when streaming took over.
Spotify-like streaming services like Rhapsody existed during that gap but they weren't compatible with the iPod and even players they were compatible required a pretty cumbersome process in order to sync and listen offline. I think Rhapsody enjoyed a relatively brief period when smartphones became available and they could stream from there but it was a no-brainer to switch to Spotify once they launched in the U.S.
I use this all the time. It sits in a tiny corner of my unscaled 4k display.
Foobar fans may disagree, but I stand my ground.
But I always had a few major gripes with it:
- The tiny interface was hard to navigate.
- The queue was ephemeral and much too easy to clear. Any time there were more than one person controlling the music someone would by accident clear out all selected songs when all whey wanted to do was add their selection to the queue. With no way to restore it.
My personal vote is iTunes 4.5 with Winamp 2 a close second.
lack of cross platform options inspired me to start reAMP:
https://github.com/conceptualspace/reAMP
it's still very much an experiment but the end goal is an open source player made with the same love of music that inspired the original winamp. some of the features im working on:
- smart shuffle algorithm: no repeats until playlist exhausted; randomized between artists so artists with many songs do not monopolize the playlist
- studio quality audio analysis (VU meter, oscilloscope, spectrum analyzer, full track waveform, displays for bitrate, samplerate, channels, format, encoder)
- controls to loop, change tempo
- remote control via mobile with queuing and adding youtube URLs ('party mode')
- logarithmic volume control
Example: https://streamable.com/nzy730
Though one thing from foobar2000 that I'd miss is Bauer stereophonic-to-binaural DSP plugin, as I listen to music mostly via headphones. Does reAMP have something similar?
Well then, cheers!
Skinnable, lightweight, portable.. free. Been my player for years.
Why do you feel the need to taunt ?
It lives on in a heavily bastardized form as iTunes and now the macOS Music app.
2017 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14689280
2013 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5616323
Discussed at the time: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4154421
A friend recently played a set at an online party using two instances of VLC, went down great!
Those were the days though.
Then BOOM - ads everywhere, bundled installers, crazy redesign. I didn't know this history.
Version 3 was pretty shitty. I think they used new tech to build it and also replaced the UI.
Later they released v5, which was v2 UI + v3 tech, which was good again.
At least that's how I remember it.
These days my go-to music player on Windows is https://github.com/digimezzo/dopamine-windows
It is open source, super clean and polished. At 33mb it is not quite as compact as Winamp, but not bad for today's standards....
It’s just a relic of the past, but in its day it was amazing. As an old guy I still use it. Asking a 10 year old to use Winamp to play an mp3 would be like asking a 20 year old to figure out how to use a rotary phone now.
I listen to tunes with the Android version of Winamp.
> Asking a 10 year old to use Winamp to play an mp3
You still need an application of some sort to play media. Are you saying that the pre-installed ones on mobile devices and desktop (e.g. Windows media player) are so vastly better than Winamp that Winamp looks like a rotary phone?
> And ultimately mp3s lost out to streaming.
I'm sorry, but that's not a well-considered statement. Albums are still a thing; people still collect music that they like.
Streaming allows people who want to casually listen to music to use their device as one previously used a radio.
(Speaking of which, streaming has not even killed radio yet.)
A ten year old kid today can still understand that stream content won't always be there, and is inaccessible whenever you are out of mobile networking coverage, so you better capture your favorite material to your device.
Sorry but this is an ignorant statement about the current landscape. A tiny minority of people still buy mp3s or CDs. Most music these days are consumed via streaming. Just because you do it doesn’t mean that most other people do it. Even I still use Winamp and listen to mp3s but that doesn’t mean that most people still do.
My comment doesn't have anything to do with buying. I haven't bought a CD in some 25 years myself.
People still play content stored in their device.
And people who used to download mp3s found that they no longer needed to maintain music anymore if they paid a small subscription fee.
Digital music sales are lower than physical CD sales, which is 5% of what it used to be back in 2000. The numbers speak for themselves.
I would've kept using Winamp if version 3 wasn't so bad, and I know many others like myself. So even if maybe eventually Winamp would've died for the reasons you mentioned, its initial problems were most definitely the result of what 'it did'.
I also switched from Windows to MacOS just before that and transitioning from Winamp (where a lot of meta data for my collection was stored in the filesystem as directory hierarchy) to iTunes was sorta painful and trying.
It's smoothness and performance at the time of couple-hundred-MHz CPUs was outstanding.
Damn. How many good product died or stagnated, because of stupid politics.