Hacker News Reader

Comment by so33 | Hacker News Reader

I believe the first Intel product announced was the [EDIT: iMac - see: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IMac_(Intel-based)#1st_generat...] MacBook Pro at Macworld in January of 2006, long after it was announced at WWDC in 2005.

I think concerns about how Apple will handle the transition can generally be addressed by the relatively smooth transition from PPC to Intel. Apple has literally done this before.

View on HN

Apple transitions CPU architectures every 10-15 years.

6502 -> 68k in 1984 via hard-cutover [edit: see cestith's reply, there's more to this story than I knew]

68k -> PPC in 1994 via emulation

PPC -> x86 in 2006 via Rosetta JIT translation

x86 -> ARM in 2020 via Rosetta 2 static recompilation

You could even argue the transition from Mac OS 9 to Mac OS X was a transition of similar magnitude (although solely on PowerPC processors), with Classic Environment running a full Mac OS 9 instance [1]

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_macOS_components#Class...

They also had the IIgs which was the 65c816 in 16-bit mode. The Lisa was in 1983 before the Mac, and it was a 68k.

A 65c816 runs 6502 code natively.

Yes, in 8-bit mode. The IIgs runs with the processor in 16-bit mode from everything I've read about it. It might be able to swap modes to run older Apple software, but the IIgs is a 16-bit machine.

I disagree that 6502 -> 68k was a "transition." The Apple II and Mac were two separate product lines. The three major early home computer companies (Apple, Atari, Commodore) all did this.

Though Apple did sell a card that allowed 6502 apps to run on a Macintosh.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple_IIe_Card

This is true, but note it was released in 1991, many years after the Mac's introduction. By that time, the Apple II was definitely on the way out. The last hold outs (schools...) probably needed encouragement.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com