https://www.dexerto.com/entertainment/ninja-shroud-could-ret...
https://www.dexerto.com/entertainment/ninja-shroud-could-ret...
> Ninja and Shroud are now free agents
Then an Ad on Twitch in front of 100k viewers is different than an Ad on Mixer (not really sure if they have Ads on Mixer). With Ninja's viewership on Twitch 60 second Ad, can probably bring him more than $10k. Not sure if he had used Ads though (may streamers chose not to use them).
I can see Facebook trying to lure them with similar contracts but I think that’s just part of the stupidity of trying to dominate in this space.
I’m gonna assume that they signed agreements where they were only getting paid the bulk based on performance numbers tied to their presence in Mixer.
So it’s clear that their brands didn’t do shit for Mixer, and now Twitch knows this so they lost any leverage they could have. But they probably are going back to Twitch because they can get way more distribution and keep building their audience. They just won’t get the same benefits they got with those exclusivity deals.
Those streamers are clearly the biggest losers here.
If it’s true, then MSFT needs better lawyers to write their contracts.
"Facebook offered an insane offer at almost double for the original Mixer contracts of Ninja and Shroud but Loaded/Ninja/Shroud said no and forced Mixer to buy them out. Ninja made ~$30M from Mixer, and Shroud made ~$10M"
Yes, I know it is a tweet, but slasher is widely thought of as the leading game journalist, when it comes to gaming "leaks" and the like.
Contracts are a function of power.
If you are asking me to leave roughly $1.5 million+ guaranteed per year for your service that's going to bring me effectively zero for years, you're going to have to pay me quite a lot in cash.
$10 million is about the 10 year run rate--which is a bog standard valuation for a business.