Ever since Gödel proved his theorem, people have used it as a metaphor for all kinds of things, from new age mysticism to psychology, biology, quantum physics, AI etc.
It's a very worn metaphor and mostly used by people who don't actually understand the theorem precisely, just the imagined "gist", often with fundamental misunderstandings. A bit how people use Eistein's relativity theory to then derive moral relativism because "everything's relative".
This blog post may actually provide insight, but it's too long to see.
Given the prior that Gödel is often used just to borrow the prestige and aura of mathematics and to sell insight porn, I cannot justify reading it without seeing a summary.
I start to appreciate the rigid form of scientific articles more and more. People often say it's too rigid, too contorted, we'd be better if people just wrote blog posts in plain language, but then you get unstructured page after page, where you don't know where to look. With some training one can quickly assess the importance/relevance of scientific articles, exactly due to the rigid format. Here I have no idea where I can find the main idea. It is important to be effective in getting ideas across.