> "not if some people consider it offensive. that alone is a sufficient reason to support this change, even if you don't think it's necessary."

I looked at article and taking offense at some of the words for which changes have been proposed by Twitter is really far-fetched. Some examples:

- Grandfathered -> legacy status

- Sanity check -> quick check, confidence check, coherence check

- Dummy value -> placeholder value, sample value

Is there really a plausible case for somebody to be offended by the phrase "sanity check"?