Hacker News Reader

Comment by adevx | Hacker News Reader

It's good to see a status update for Vue 3, and creatively done I must say. If Vue's (Vuex) TypeScript support wasn't as bad as it is in Vue 2, I would not be as eagerly awaiting this 3.0 release. Currently on the fence to rewrite a large project to Next.js + TypeScript + Mobx as I have to move things forward and expect the whole ecosystem to take a long time to catch up.

View on HN

I've been starting a new project using Svelte + Routity + TailwindCss. It's been an amazingly productively stack, although the tooling is on the young side with occasional rough edges. Overall though, it feels great. Even for a side project, it's fun to pick up as it's pretty minimal framework overhead to learn. There's several templates out there, but I've created this one for specifically the above stack: https://github.com/jadbox/routify-starter/tree/tailwind

How do you guys even manage to convince your client/employer to use a stack so young? Assuming it's not a side project, ofc.

I run a small business where my website generates my main income. So if I make the wrong choice here it's all on me. But I don't think it's that young in web-cycle terms.

Sounds like a great stack. I was also looking for a clean, simple and productive stack and looked into Svelte. But I do really enjoy TypeScript and it does not seem to be well supported.

> Next.js + TypeScript + Mobx

That's honestly a nice stack and don't see how you would regret it

http://aurelia.io/

Reply on news.ycombinator.com