These two threads seem contradictory to me:

1> For the employees, [post-acquisition] is business as usual for the most part. The goal is for the employees to not even notice.

2> You can buy companies and replace expensive people with a global remote workforce that is just as good (or better) and cheaper.

Can someone with more knowledge or experience of Tiny acquisitions explain which of these is true? Are they a holding company for SaaS companies with extra best practices, or a cuddly face on traditional PE cost-cutting tactics? The article itself doesn't seem sure. (And, oddly, appears not to notice the contradiction.)