No comment about the paper itself, but note that the first author is Alexander Ioannidis, not the John Ioannidis of Covid infamy.

Your sole contribution to this discourse is to bad talk someone while providing absolutely no evidence? I have no dog in this fight. I have no idea how solid the article is. But that’s why I’m not trashing it.

Nature is peer reviewed right? Who in the genomics community is saying that this is BS?

Totally different person. Same last name. Probably not related.

Anthropologists just make shit up, because it's how you get published and it's hard to disprove and truth be told people like stories real or not.

These DNA tests are mathematically provable so it's much harder to make stuff up, this shouldn't be so much in the fakeish sciences like biology or worse, this should be more bounded. Where have you read this?