Oklahoma was part of the Louisiana purchase, the US considered it their land for that reason.
The US signed treaties with the indigeneous population in an attempt to secure peace, not out of any sort of acknowledgement that they had to.
Oklahoma was part of the Louisiana purchase, the US considered it their land for that reason.
The US signed treaties with the indigeneous population in an attempt to secure peace, not out of any sort of acknowledgement that they had to.
and by doing so, acknowledged that those indigenous populations were soveriegn nations. It doesn't matter why they signed those treaties, the only thing that matters is that they did.
You don't get to cancel a treaty just because the other party used to have leverage over you and doesn't anymore.
Yes. That's why we had to write treaties with them, to gain proper title to the land. Even if we treated those who signed the treaties as having more authority than they actually did, and if we treated the treaties as mere scraps of paper, those treaties were still seen as treaties with legitimate sovereign nations.