Does this not make the digits of Pi discreetly distributed (an equal chance for each integer?)? Is the meaning of 'normal' here not referencing a normal distribution?
Does this not make the digits of Pi discreetly distributed (an equal chance for each integer?)? Is the meaning of 'normal' here not referencing a normal distribution?
The article intends normal number, not normal distribution.
The common thread is the Latin word "norma" for a carpentry square. This gets taken literally in cases like "normal vector", figuratively in cases like "Euclidean norm" (i.e. to measure) then increasingly distant as the word is a root to mean usual/ordinary/average (i.e. according to standard measure) in many languages and thereby ends up in "normal number", "normalized vector", etc. "Normal distribution" inherits it doubly, Gauss used it in the orthogonality sense and later authors in the ordinary sense.