If you live in the US (she didn't) then Amazon can be a decent option for a lot of reach though.
Amazon and other similar print on demand services also help with this but it's not suitable for all products (full colour can be a problem).
If you live in the US (she didn't) then Amazon can be a decent option for a lot of reach though.
Amazon and other similar print on demand services also help with this but it's not suitable for all products (full colour can be a problem).
With certain professional books publishing with a known publisher definitely gives the book a certain "gravitas" (deserved or not) that it may not have if you independently publish. And if you're mostly writing a book to burnish your professional reputation (as is often the case) rather than to make money, that may be a pretty good tradeoff even if you could have made more in direct sales if you published yourself.
To be honest, I'm not sure publishers do an awful lot for you directly though you will probably have to pay out of your pocket for things like editing services if you go it yourself, but the name does still often matter.
I had declined both of them as they only offered 10% royalty rates.
I didn't have to pay for editing. I did everything myself: writing, diagrams, proofreading, marketing.
In fact, I decided to self-publish it after reading this article from Antonio Goncalves about his Java EE 7 book:
https://antoniogoncalves.org/2014/09/16/the-uncensored-java-...
(The good news is that it's not really expensive to pay someone to do if you don't really need the services of a full-blown editor who is advising on structure, flow, etc.)
Agreed, but it's easy to hire a freelance copy editor. In fact, that's often what traditional publishers do too.
IMO, it's not something you can rely on software for although software catches a lot of course. The one time I didn't do it worked out OK. But I had a co-author and we had sufficiently reworked the (somewhat shorter) book enough times over a fairly long period that I decided it had had enough fresh eyes on it to stand on its own.
And of course publishers aren't perfect either. I've found a few typos in my last book which did go through a traditional publisher even though I also proofread it pretty carefully. (One mistake was in front matter which I added fairly late on which makes me suspect there would have been a lot more errors in the book if I didn't check it carefully myself.)
I did a lot of the editing myself, my writing is fine, but my feedback was mostly typos/grammar/phrasing - not a coherent look at the overall structure and content which a more experienced editor may do.