Cryptographers have spent years trying to clean up the GNU cryptography ecosystem [1] [2].
[1] https://twitter.com/FiloSottile/status/1281055144659030016
[2] https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gcrypt-devel/2015-November...
Cryptographers have spent years trying to clean up the GNU cryptography ecosystem [1] [2].
[1] https://twitter.com/FiloSottile/status/1281055144659030016
[2] https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gcrypt-devel/2015-November...
I get that crypto is hard (again, the messup in the central criticism in the linked article is a great existence proof). I don't get why you feel like taking potshots at GNU in particular is justified except to flog your personal political agenda.
I'd love for GNU cryptography to be better, but the first step in fixing problems is to acknowledge they exist in the first place.
GNUnet, GnuPG, etc. need to actually learn from modern cryptography projects like age and Signal, instead of doubling down in the name of ideology.
Just stop. If you have criticisms, make them. Leave your politics out of it.