I Know What You Download on BitTorrent | Hacker News Reader

I Know What You Download on BitTorrent

iknowwhatyoudownload.com

An intern once thought it was a good idea to torrent a couple of Game of Thrones episodes using my startup's Digital Ocean box.

We found out after Digital Ocean forwarded us an email from HBO (who presumably tracked Digital Ocean down via the IP) that we were engaging in piracy. We sent an email to everyone with access, saying whoever was doing it to stop. Then we got a second email (a final warning).

Everyone denied doing it, so I had to find the offender via checking the bash history of the box for all users.

Sure enough a couple of mkv files had been downloaded and deleted by an intern :( Making the mistake of downloading it was forgiveable once, since we lived in a culture where piracy was rampant / normal (this was before Netflix et al were available in my country). But repeating the offense, failing to come clean and making us waste our time to locate who did it was not. (This was a small 7 person startup so trust was super important).

As for why the intern needed to ssh into a digital ocean box to run a torrent? The college internet (where he was working from) blocked torrent connections and he wanted to be the first one to download and release the episodes on the college intranet. Smh.

I used to work at a ~100 person company that provided satellite equipment, mostly to media companies - radio stations, movie distributors, that type of thing.

A senior customer service rep realized he had VPN access to a customer's, like.. T1 line. He started torrenting movies on it. On the CUSTOMERS network. Our entire company was nearly taken offline and the customer threatened cancelling the entire contract and suing us.

Dude got walked out the next day. A MEDIA company customer.

http://bash.org/?258908

I worked for a place where our internet was bad, but not that bad. We were coming up to a release and things were fubar. I asked the network guy to find what was up - a guy that reported to me was torrenting child porn.

My previous employer had a strongly worded email and CEO statement sent out after they were sent a notice of over 100 company IPs (out of 15000 employees) torrenting the game of thrones finale to basically tell people "Hey, don't do that, we do business with many of those companies".

The flip side: When I was an intern I once had four people arrive at my desk (including an HR lawyer) for torrenting ubuntu server.

Thankfully I shared a cube wall with someone smart enough to realize the confusion, and explain me out of being walked out.

They were monitoring for torrent traffic, but weren't paying attention to what was being torrented. Apparently a company-wide warning had gone out the week before I started.

I remember getting an abuse warning from Hetzner as one of our employees was seeding (legal) files via a p2p file sharing framework (IPFS I think?) and the client on his machine sent out broadcast and port scanning requests over the VPN into our Hetzner infrastructure. Hetzner is quite nice in that they dont' immediately block your servers, other providers are less lenient though and such stuff can quickly get your infrastructure to be taken down, especially if you're not an "important" customer of your hoster. I think after you reach a certain scale you can't stop this from happening easily, so it's good to either block such stuff via the firewall or have good audit logs.

The only moral problem I have in your anecdote is the lying about it. With every fibre of my being, I could not care less about torrenting game of thrones.

Couldn't the intern have paid for his own bare bones VPS and done it from there? Or used a different paid VPN service, which cost roughly the same ~$5? Seems like the cost of a VPN compared to the value of his internship wouldn't even compare. All for some campus clout.

I paid for a dedicated server with an unmetered 100mbit connection back in the day. (More than a decade ago, now that I think about it) I wasn't using it for much, so I decided to be a good citizen and run a Tor exit node on it. No filters, every port, why not? What could go wrong?

Well, it turns out you can run bittorrent over Tor. Got dozens of DMCA emails, host took the server down within 24 hours. Taught me a lesson on being nice.

I once pirated a Tv show and was accidentally on my work VPN for a portion of it.

Had a moment of being a bit frozen and scared.

Decided to email the IT head and explain the situation. I got a “thanks for letting me know” and that was it. Not as big a deal as my head conjured up.

I could have done the wrong thing though and made it a big deal.

Another interesting story (as the site is just picking on IP, disregarding dynamic ips, vpns etc.) that might save potential users (for legal cases) some costs. The service is heavly false positive and wrong accusation might be expensive:

https://torrentfreak.com/wrongfully-accused-pirate-wins-4420...

seedr.cc, bitport.io or zbigz.com exist to solve this problem and would have saved him his job.

Game of Thrones was the most pirated TV show in history. I remember when the first 4 episodes of season 5 were leaked at once. Christmas came early!

My collage had similar restrictions for many website and torrents. I tried something similar by renting a server and then trying to download torrent in it but obviously got instantly blocked from Service provider.

Somehow 1-2 months later I got a request from my college's computer center to make some changes in the college intranet landing page. Then I became good friends with them. and later I got an account from them, where everything was open. I was a good time ;)

Hmm but doing that in a 7 person startup, and then repeating the offense, and then failing to come clean !! seriously man..

One needs to remember to cover their tracks :)

When I was young and stupid (at least more than now) I did some pranks using dormitory server, and knew that I should clean bash history (actually using a single space before command did that).

But what I didn't know was that vim also has a history of commands :) server admin wasn't happy.

Ugh, and he/she could have gotten a box for an evening for fraction of a cent or something. To even think about using company infrastructure for this seems really very uneducated. Ok, that wouldn't also have been stupid, but at least you wouldn't put your company at risk.

You'd think they would just pay for their own droplet in that scenario. Digital Ocean runs promo's all the time with free credits too.

Somehow I can only see one this comment of 252 in this thread.

So did you sack him?

The problem here is not recognizing that the piracy was actually the problem. In what way was it forgivable? Because everybody does it, that makes it okie dokie? Because you don't have a Netflix account? If everyone treated piracy as theft (it is) then no one would have to waste their time investigating it because the collective will would exist to prevent it.

Well my ISP gives out a dynamic IP address each time my DSL modem connects to them, so this tactic only reveals who downloaded what when they were assigned my current IP. Nothing much can be inferred from this data unless you are the ISP or govt and can tie the IP to the subscriber.

And yes, it shows my IP downloaded the movie Zombieland, which I never did, so it is some other subscriber of the same ISP.

Where I am currently in India, the ISP does provider-level NAT: multiple customers are on the same IPv4 address. No idea how many. This thing is showing around a dozen movies (a mixture of English and local language, plus it looks like someone wants to become a web developer) being downloaded per day, and I’m confident none of them are coming from the local network I’m attached to. This NAT is also a right pain, because there are always at least one or two strains of malware running on the address, so that it’s always on at least one or two blacklists, which causes the occasional problem. As an example, earlier today I couldn’t access ConvertKit’s Terms of Service page at all because Wordfence didn’t like my IP address. (But it only blocked access to that one page. Weird.) It was worse when I was here 3–4 years ago: at that time, the IP address was on most of the blacklists, and each and every site protected by Cloudflare would complain and require a CAPTCHA before it would let you in. (Though at least it would let you in, unlike Wordfence today.) It’s times like that when you realise viscerally just how much of the internet is behind Cloudflare.

Back in 2012, the same ISP was intercepting all DNS (!) and serving OpenDNS with the stupid give-you-a-search-page-instead-of-an-NXDOMAIN-response thing that they had back then, forcibly enabled.

Hopefully the copy of “Avast Premium Security 20.2.2401 (Build 20.2.5130) Final + Serial” someone downloaded will help them clear the malware out, rather than make things worse.

Nowadays internet users on cable often keep the same IP address for weeks if not months. Who knows, your ISP could change its configuration tomorrow and always re-assign the same IP address to you as long as its available.

I think the point of this website is to show people that using torrents is far from anonymous and invisible.

That, and you should know that there is almost certainly history of who had which IP address when; it's not going to be the same DHCP server running on your small router.

If you download something, get a new IP, and the ISP gets a complaint for your old IP, they have that data and may be obligated legally to do something about it.

I'm on LTE. The carrier grade NAT implementation of my ISP may use a different public IP address for each TCP connection I make.

The webserver of my bank sees it as a hack and will then log me out.

Fortunately my ISP also has an APN when I'm allocated my own IP.

Yeah back when there was that company that used to send threatening emails through ISP companies I used to get emails from my ISP claiming I downloaded various shows and movies I had never seen. It was a completely pointless farce and fraud.

I checked this from a phone who's provider NATs IPV4.

People be wild on their mobile connections. I don't torrent on mobile only because the bandwidth will get me throttled, but god damn someone on my NAT has some filthy habits.

yeah at first I thought this was a prank and it just randomly shows you a lot of porn and movies and games and stuff (I mean who torrents porn?). Now I am not sure if other people on my ISP have bad taste / are dumb or a combination of both.

Likewise, this says I downloaded 3 movies I've never heard of.

Indeed, not only I'm seeing somebody else's pretty mediocre taste, but I have no idea of my previous ips so can't check real accuracy.

However, what does impress me is that somebody downloaded multiple movies and games a day, with books and tailoring instructions thrown in. Dunno if the site counts seeding torrents too, but if not—someone is very busy just consuming all that.

I don't know but I imagine ISPs keep a record of which IPs they have assigned to which modems, no?

This kind of thing is already done heavily by content rights-holders. If you torrent movies or games in Canada without a VPN, you will get nastygrams in your email from the rights-holders via your ISP. They're legally required to do so AFAIK, because even consumer-oriented ISPs that are very privacy driven also forward on those letters.

Apparently if you don't reply to those emails you're fine, because they can't escalate the process unless you reply - I've heard stories of people receiving dozens of these "we saw you downloading pirate stuff, stop doing that" emails.

We should really stop calling copyright infringement 'piracy'. Piracy is a violent penal crime which results in a theft of property by the use of physical force / weapons. Accepting this label helps media conglomerates distort the public perception of the issue into their favor.

I "had a friend" with a Comcast (or maybe Cox) email address that was given to them when they started with their internet service, but didn't know about. They didn't use a VPN and downloaded thousands of movies and TV shows. Several years after signing up they logged into their account to update their auto-billing info, and it notified them that they had new emails at the email address they had no idea existed. They had literally thousands of these threatening sounding emails and called me in a panic, thinking they were going to have to pay several million dollars. But I calmed them down when told them that they had been getting these emails for several years and nothing else had happened.

Comcast had their personal information to include their home address, so they obviously could have snail-mailed them something or sent a process server if they were actually being sued, but they didn't. I figure that most individuals don't make enough money to make actual lawsuits worth it- what is the court going to do, garnish $10/month from someone flipping burgers?

What, you only get emails? In Germany you straight up get snail mails from lawyers demanding you to pay for the damages.

But in Germany the only real bad thing is uploading, downloading by itself is more of a grey thing.

I believe it was Comcast who was performing payload injection (possibly over https with cert fuckery) a few years ago to display warning overlays that you've been caught torrenting.

That was egregious.

Luckily my router only supports IPV4 and I'm assigned a vague IPv4 CGNAT IP every time I switch it on. I used this site to do some OSINT on my IP and you guessed it: It looks like I'm sharing my IP with 1000s of other subscribers so doing attribution to 'me' would be hard and also wouldn't hold up in court. Also see:

https://www.eff.org/de/deeplinks/2011/08/why-ip-addresses-al...

https://www.securityweek.com/eff-warns-police-courts-about-u...

Be careful with this, your ISP can easily record the NAT translations and going to your ISP with a connection 5-tuple would be enough to track it back to you.

It's harder, perhaps, but not impossible, and would certainly still hold up in court. When tracking a user behind CGNAT you need to capture not just their source IP, but also their source port. If you have timestamp, source IP and source port, that's enough for the ISP to resolve it back to the subscriber.

- Was 26

- Moved into company apartment

- Torrented stuff

- Company received a $30k lawsuit for downloading porn on company network

- Hear CEO talking to lawyers (open office)

- 99% sure it was me

- Come clean to CEO

- Was actually another c-suite who forgot they were logged into the VPN

> Come clean to CEO

Talk about integrity. I'd give you a raise after this if you were my employee.

- company apartment

I guess there's a reason company generally aren't allowed to provide housing in many countries. Some things should just be separate...

What happened next? Did they punish you?

Explain the lawsuit?

Laughs in Usenet. The proliferation of streaming services and restricted content has me investing in alternative options more these days. It's not about paying for content, it's about content becoming less accessible again.

> Laughs in Usenet

The rise in pirate binary groups is what killed Usenet feeds on most ISPs.

I used to be a great follower of text groups but it became more and more difficult to find a feed and the overall signal:noise ratio faded.

Eventually I gave up. Thanks for nothing, you folks who want to watch other people's content for free.

How can you tell if someone uses on usenet? Ask them what a par files are.

Alternately, a seedbox or seebox-like service like Put.io.

My ISP actually prohibits P2P transfers, so whatever you're downloading, if you want to use torrents, it's the only way to go without getting nasty emails.

Usenet has its own issues though. The past couple years there’s been a massive jump in DMCA takedowns.

On certain things you now have download as it becomes available, in a week it’ll be gone. For things that no one cares to pay for monitoring of, you can go back years.

So, pros and cons to torrents that don’t get taken down specially but torrents “die” of old age when no one seeds them.

It’s odd to me that file sharing seems to have hit a wall after torrents got popular. Doesn’t it seem like Usenet shouldn’t be the best option considering it’s age?

Less?! I have had little to no problem finding even niche media on the internet...

Off topic but this raises a question about iMesssage parsing of URLs. I copied just the base URL (without my IP, so he would get his) and sent this to a friend. The preview in iMessage lists my IP, because iMessage actually visited the link. Does the message he receives show his IP or mine?

e: Just tested this, it shows my IP on the receiving end. It appears iMessage creates the preview text on the sender’s side so this will leak your IP. I tried it in Slack too and it leaked whatever IP Slack used to fetch the URL which interestingly is not my IP.

Signal has a fairly detailed strategy for previews, as they're quite privacy sensitive: https://support.signal.org/hc/en-us/articles/360022474332-Li...

And a (small, but has a few links) blog post about it: https://signal.org/blog/i-link-therefore-i-am/

This feature is a “very good thing” so you can’t force someone to disclose their whereabouts to you by sending them a link to the server you control.

If you don’t want to send people your own info in the thumbnail, don’t send them thumbs of URLs that display your own info to you in image or title text when generating the preview on your device.

I just checked a few links sent back and forth between me and another iMessage friend, both from within Messages.app on my Mac, and the synced Messages app on my iPhone. I don't see any IPs being displayed at the end of URL strings when I copy and paste the link from the generated previews. My friend would have definitely only ever sent links from their iPhone, but often I would send mine from the Mac.

How exactly do you find these leaked IPs?

The web preview in iMessage is performed by each client. So your friend should see their IP in the preview since it's their client making the connection on their end.

This is easy to test if you've got another device with iMessage. Take your phone off WiFi and send yourself the link. The device on WiFi should show your home ISP address while the device on cellular should show the cellular provider IP.

I've been using a Seedbox since December 2014.

Best 15$/month I pay. You can even pay with Bitcoin, tho I just use PayPal.

2 TB of storage, very fast speed with caching (i.e. some torrents finish immediately if someone else has it downloaded). An uncached Blu-ray ~4 GB movie gets finished in 15-30 mins.

They also have auto-delete feature. If they get a legal complaint they just delete the offending torrent and keep my account the same, no "strikes" or anything like that.

I then download the actual content either from FTP or HTTPS. If its a movie, I just download the single .mp4 file from the portal itself (and skip the subtitle/cover files) with HTTPS straight from Chrome, or even stream it directly through VLC! I only use the FTP if there is a large number of files (e.g. series or non-ISO-packaged software).

They have servers in US, Netherlands and Singapore. I always use the Netherlands server. I doubt anyone uses the US ones.

Even better? I can use the 2 TB for whatever I want, not just for the torrents. That's cheaper than most cloud storage plans for just dummy storage without any torrenting features!

Only problem I have with torrents are unpopular movies/series usually have no seeds, but there is nothing that can be done about that. Only older clients like LimeWire/eMule didn't have that problem, but those had endless malware issues because the content wasn't verified.

Pro-tip: Do not download the actual .torrent file. Many websites are setup to redirect you into an endless loop of shady .exe downloads. Always, always just copy the magnet link to your clipboard. This also makes you safe from any network monitoring that checks for .torrent downloads. No one can prove anything if you just copy a magnet link to your clipboard then paste it to a seedbox since they don't/can't monitor clipboards. Just browsing the page which has the link is perfectly file and doesn't prove intent, vs actually downloading a .torrent file.

VPNs in comparison are quite dodgy. They have slower speeds, no torrent-caching, its possible (and happens more than it should) that the software has a bad config and skips the VPN and uses your actual connection.

Also, I can never trust that the VPN company won't share my details if they get a legal request, specially when most of them are in the US.

VPNs are useful for bypassing censored networks in a university campus or corporate network, but for torrenting they're infinitely inferior to seedboxes.

> Only problem I have with torrents are unpopular movies/series usually have no seeds, but there is nothing that can be done about that.

> Pro-tip: Do not download the actual .torrent file. Many websites are setup to redirect you into an endless loop of shady .exe downloads. Always, always just copy the magnet link to your clipboard.

A better pro-tip for these issues: if you're anyway using a seed box, figure out and switch to private trackers and follow their rules. With the good ones around, you won't have to worry about shady downloads. Some of the unpopular or older content may also be available on those.

> Even better? I can use the 2 TB for whatever I want, not just for the torrents. That's cheaper than most cloud storage plans for just dummy storage without any torrenting features!

To be clear: you're presumably not paying for redundancy there (which you usually are with cloud providers), so you're trading price for an increased risk of data loss, which may or may not matter to you.

> I then download the actual content either from FTP or HTTPS. If its a movie, I just download the single .mp4 file from the portal itself (and skip the subtitle/cover files) with HTTPS straight from Chrome, or even stream it directly through VLC!

Since you mentioned you're using Whatbox in another comment, why not simply use Plex to catalog and stream the files?

> the software has a bad config and skips the VPN and uses your actual connection

Just stuff it into a separate network namespace. It's easy to do with firejail, but can also be done manually (firejail automatically configures the IP address, the routing table, and so on.)

  $ cat /etc/firejail/qbittorrent.local
  
  net        enp3s0
  ip         192.168.100.201
  dns        1.1.1.1 1.0.0.1

Curious why pay $15/mo for a seedbox just to securely pirate content.

No judgement, just curiosity.

Which seed box?

Another interesting one is to hit the "My Contributions" button on Wikipedia when you're not logged in. This will show you anonymous edits that have come from your IP address.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MyContributions

There are a lot of weird people who share my IP address editing a lot of weird stuff!

Very interesting! Thanks for sharing this, I also got some interesting responses from a VPN.

Also supports subnet notation, so you could add /24 to the end of the URL for example.

Interesting. If I use ProtonVPN, one of the Australian IPs is blocked globally.

Apparently Blindspot, Warrior, Hanna and the Twilight zone is pretty popular for my ip address. I've never downloaded any of these and Twilight zone is the only one i've even heard of. I also can't torrent things through my service provider, they throttle them, so i've never actually used a torrent program at all from this IP. So, that I guess...

Has your IP address changed recently? I definitely didn't want to post this under the implication that it is always 100% accurate.

One of my neighboring IPs distributes child pornography according to this site, which is just fan-fucking-tastic. Anyone know how far Comcast distributes IPs on the same subnet geographically?

Funny, Hannah and twilight zone in my building too. Wouldn't surprise me if they have some titles sprinkled through where they have no content

It lists a bunch of crap especially porn and Bollywood movies and some chines stuff I cant identify what it is but certainly no one in my household torrented it. Meanwhile it does not list a single distro iso that I have been seeding for months. The IP and torrent client is correct tho. Strange.

Dynamic IP? I doubt you're the first one to use that IP address.

Same here. I torrented a doz distros but only one logged. Nothing I'm seeding shows up.

My dynamic IP can go a year w/o changing. I have to re-spoof my MAC when I want a new one.

I do give you credit of giving people a quick shot how accurate torrent detection can be if you are a casual user not using VPN. Or not using private trackers.

But.

You dont know and you are clueless that this is not my ip.

Furthermore, I have also checked my phone where I have never downloaded any torrent and you are showing 3 movies.

This is just scaremongering.

I did a few more tests.

For multiple private trackers you didnt detect anything (except your false positives), you have failed to detect there is more than one user of IP, you didnt detect VPN (but you could).

Not accurate at all.

A sane advice from this example - use VPN (from other jurisdiction than you are in and not massively well known or free), stop using public tracker.

> Furthermore, I have also checked my phone where I have never downloaded any torrent and you are showing 3 movies. This is just scaremongering.

Not sure if this is the same in every country but mobile phones in UK jump around the same IP block pretty frequently (i.e all day long) even when standing still - i'm using this as home internet so i notice.

IP addresses are re-used all the time, this is why it's not usually permissible as evidence in court.

The down side of such frequent IP changes is i'm pretty much permablocked by google and captcha'd to death by them due to frequently swapping IPs with in pool of users with malware (now i've completely given up using google.com).

Yep, typically phone companies put mobile internet behind NAT, exactly this is why I tested it, as I knew it will be false positive. ;)

If your mobile uses a dynamic IP the pool will be shared by others. In my country at least, Logs of client details to DHCP assigned IPs is Legally required.

Private torrents do not show up because I know what you download relies on DHT broadcasts.

This website shows a good 40 downloads from my IP, and I don't recognize a single one. I have torrented some files recently, but they're not in the list. And so far I've never used a VPN, it's unnecessary where I live.

Not very reliable.

Your ISP is certainly using CGNAT, or maybe IPv6, so multiple subscribers look to be using 1 IPv4.

Anyone had to trawl through a daily access log list looking to establish proof something happened? I have, it sucked and the effort in wasn't worth what we got out of it in the end.

I'm pretty confident my ISP is doing the least amount of work possible to fulfill its logging and archive requirements. Keeping track of this stuff is like cleaning up industrial waste. It's not core the money stream for ISP's so it's going to be daily logs, zipped up on glacier storage, or better just hdd's that get thrown in a container and cycled out each year.

People gotta do something these days, there's talk covid may go for 24 months!

Previously (December 2017): https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15971020

Previously (December 2016): https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13249578

And January 2020: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22102806

Please do not visit this site unless if you want to be tracked.

In addition it is extremely inaccurate, it used to say that 8.8.8.8 was torrenting anime.

It says they scrape torrent sites and then listen to DHT.

But even assuming they scrape "all" torrents, what percentage of users use DHT as opposed to just trackers, and how often will a DHT request hit their server as opposed to someone else's? And are they really able to simultaneously function as part of the DHT for all torrents they've ever scraped, or is it only some small percentage at a time?

I'm just wondering if they're managing to grab something like 90% of torrenting activity, or more like 1%?

Legality aside, I'm just really curious about the technical accuracy here. Also why they chose DHT instead of connecting to trackers directly.

Given that DHT means websites hosting magnet links are in the greyest possible of legal areas, as opposed to websites that run their own tracker, which makes them pretty much guilty of aiding and abetting by default: DHT is by far the more used technology these days.

Wow, people at my apartment must download a LOT. Including several items listed as child pornography, about which the site declines to provide additional details; as well as this listed as regular pornography, but which I believe is actually malware-ridden audio editing software. https://iknowwhatyoudownload.com/en/torrent/?id=a8579ced8872...

Funny to see how many movies are torrented on a mobile 4g network. What a waste of bandwidth.

I tried from my phone's 4G and saw someone had downloaded a movie bigger than the typical data cap for my carrier. Yikes.

In Kuwait a normal 4G contract includes 1TB of monthly traffic and people use it to watch Netflix on their 4K TVs.

Interestingly, I used to download a lot of torrents years ago. When Spotify came along, it dropped at least 80%. Add Netflix and Steam and I haven't used torrents in a very long while actually. Simply because everything I need is available at an affordable price.

However, seeing how many streaming services are popping up lately, each with their own specialty and each wanting my money, (and seeing how crappy free Youtube is becoming) I feel more and more like coming back to my old habits . . .

As Gabe Newell once said,

"We think there is a fundamental misconception about piracy. Piracy is almost always a service problem and not a pricing problem”

Yeah, i used to be massively into piracy. now i use spotify and netflix.

I still pirate the odd thing because while it's completely worth it to pay $10/mo (or whatever it is now) for netflix, i'm not about to pay the same just to watch a single show on some other streaming service, or go through the hassle of figuring out what new service i have to sign up for or if it's even available in my country or on my roku.

You can turn it into a recomendation system! "People who downloaded this, also downloaded this"

This website used to contain all the information to generate a magnet URL for every torrent. With a simple combination of Google and a quick browser addon I've used this site as a nice way to find torrents for a while.

They've taken down the hashes now, which means the trick doesn't work anymore. Using other people's interests as recommendations was pretty useful though!

I have a static IP and it shows a whole bunch of unfamiliar torrents. What am I missing, how could it show false positives for a specific IP?

Good thinking to cya by posting a comment here that you can point to later. It's quite believable, actually.

It seems correct for me. A bunch of Linux ISOs. It is missing some I've been seeding from http://academictorrents.com/

Others mentioned having an ISP level NAT. Could that be it?

If you read the paragraph at the top, it lists other "similar" IPs. It's not strictly accurate.

Given the numerous examples of false positives / false attribution able to be extrapolated from this website's claims, I wonder if it is giving its owner(s) / operator(s) considerable legal risk.

By calling itself "I know what you download, dot com", it's potentially suggesting that "you are your IP address", thus suggesting that it is usable evidence for others to use against "you", when it actually could not be the case at all. IANAL, but this site seems legally problematic.

Smart thing to do is to use this as a content recommendation service! Or netflix can improve their catalog by knowing what content people are going off-service for.... Nevermind enforcement, this is a huge data source for marketing purposes... Wait a minute :(

When customers switch over to torrenting Netflix can keep their 'watched' list updated in case they come back.

It doesn’t know what I download on BitTorrent. I only download from a private tracker that is 15 years old, nice try :)

Yah me too.

I remember switching from XDCC to bittorrent when it first came out. There was a very short period where XDCC bots would have .torrent files on them.

Back then bit torrent was exclusively fansubs (anime) and the bit torrent client didn't have an upload limit, so it was painfully slow on the average connection.

Because at the time bit torrent didn't have any retention, and you could use a service like xdcc spy or xdcc finder to find old content similar to pirate bay today, I was somewhat of a skeptic of bit torrent then for this reason.

cries in demonoid

It correctly identifies my torrent client version and the fact that I have a static IP, but none of the things I know I have downloaded are on the list, and a bunch of stuff I haven't is (EDIT: it correctly identified one torrent).

Edit: Could this be due to me having a static ipv6 range, would my ipv4 address that this is looking at be shared by other people?

You client is politely sending items your peers are requesting, to try to find peers for them in your peer network, without having to flood everyone with irrelevant peer lists.

And this site (which i guess is just a couple lines of python collecting the data) is not bothering to distinguish any of the finer details.

I can see this being used by law enforcement in countries where IP address = person that rents it.

This is a long term practice in Germany. Lawyers connect to the swarm, collect peers and then send letters in an automated way to "shake down" people.

The solution is to use VPNs or private trackers and it's pretty widely known. If you move into a flat / AirBnB one of the first things people will tell you is to not torrent on the connection.

> in countries where IP address = person that rents it.

Does that actually exist today? At least IPv4 addresses I would expect to increasingly mean nothing, as address exhaustion drives more people behind CGNAT.

There are still plenty of places where this can apply, though. Any organization that owns an AS is susceptible to this especially. Consider universities, which might own one, where each IP corresponds to a student. Universities also just happen to be a hotbed of torrent traffic.

Without incontrovertible proof that these lists are not just "connections" but "engaged in true data exchange with us, in which we verified that the data they sent us was indeed part of the torrent in question", I'm having a harder time seeing that.

Connecting to a torrent is in itself not illegal (if it were, legal torrents such as that used for software delivery would be impossible).

Since everyone is taking about their experiences seeing workmates torrent, and no one is posting how this works -

Torrents are peer to peer. Bit torrent is a type of application. Bittorrent are not inclusive to torrents anymore.

Since everything is public, you can load several torrents, and watch for the handshake to occur and record the time/date and ip address.

Do it on a large enough scale and there you go.

There are many ways to secure against this, usually USA IP holders use USA cloud services or USA IP addresses. Some are public, but even if not, you can block the entire USA , so geoblocking by a simple tool such as: https://www.countryipblocks.net/acl.php

And you're pretty much in the clear. Not perfect, but pretty much.

When you open a .torrent file or magnet link the client connects to a set of trackers (or DHT, a distributed tracker network) and receives a list of peers to connect to. This site just repeats that process for a bunch of different torrents and collates the resulting data. Of course, dynamic IP addresses are a thing—and the trackers can (and do) lie about which IP addresses are part of a swarm. If you see something that you didn't actually download it could be because your IP address was shared with another customer recently or it could simply be a tracker "poisoning the well" by mixing in random IPs.

I'm surprised it worked even on 'private' torrents I had. I had some misguided thoughts that they were a bit more secure as you needed a specific torrent downloaded that tied you to the torrent. I see now that it's just an authentication thing on top of the public interface.

You are very much not in the clear if you block like this. That's just delusional.

Copyright monitoring firms have many endpoints that look like consumer ADSL/cable... because they are consumer connections.

There’s a business in Germany entirely dedicated to this and to send letters to people’s residence.

Why are all the porn entries highlighted red? Is it meant to shame people?

That's the colour of visited links.

There are different shades of red, too. Some of the porn entries are illegal, and rightfully are listed as such.

I have no VPN and download stuff sporadically, stream video via torrents daily, I get nothing on this site. I guess I'm good.

Me too

I am paying for whatever I can I pay where I live - hbo, amazon prime, netflix, local services, spotify.

I think about stop paying and switch to torrents simply because of the horrible UI each of these providers has. It will probably will be more of an effort, but enough is enough.

What I want: VCL interface - start / stop / pause. What I do not want: the rest of the crap like extra info (Amazon), bad search interface (hello all), buffering issues (hello HBO, Netflix), dark patterns where you can not stop at the end of the episode, but they may let you to continue watching credits (FY everyone).

Are you using custom DNS? If so, you may be bypassing the netfix appliance at your ISP, leading to worse performance.

It is also possible, of course, that your ISP doesn't have one.

Submission from six months ago: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22102806

Yeah, I wonder who flagged this or why. It didn't come up in the search (most recent post was 3 years ago from what I saw) so I figured it would be worth a repost.

These sites are never accurate I don't know why they make the frontpage every couple years

These sites are sometimes accurate, especially for those with static IP addresses or that are on a defined range (universities, organizations, etc). It's far from a silver bullet, but it's an interesting way to look at what people are torrenting in general.

How does this site work? Do they just join popular torrent swarms and log the ips?

The phishing link they have set up to get your friends IP is pretty shady, obviously this stuff is easy to do, but pretty weak to make it easier for folks. https://iknowwhatyoudownload.com/en/link/

There are people with abusive and stupid partners who wouldn't be able to get this information without doing more work or paying money.

Not minimizing your point but I like the obvious reminder of what's possible.

Also, the what-bad-guys-might-do klaxon is a powerful tool, is too often used to restrict everyone's abilities.

What does it mean that I can see there are 256 comments on this article from the comment count, but only one (from flak48) is visible to me?

I also had this problem, on my end it appears to be resolved now.

I wonder how long before scam extortion emails link directly to this website in an attempt to add legitimate data to their extortion attempt

The beautiful part is that they may have no idea which IP address corresponds to your email until you click a unique link in the phishing email (or load a tracking pixel?).

Impressive! Perfect match for the few things I download from public swarms :)

Not only does this highlight the non-anonymity of BitTorrent, it also highlights what's wrong with link shorteners!

Jsut click the "Track Downloads" tab or go to https://ikwyd.com/r/QgHP to generate a short URL that lets you get the downloads for someone's IP address.

Since we're doing Tales Of Stupidity, I knew a guy who was reasonably highly placed in the UK side of a non-trivial multinational. At home he set up a kodi(?) box to play stuff he torrented. At least he did it at home. If he'd been caught he'd have lost his job and possibly got a black mark on his record that would have prevented him getting another managerial job. I don't think he considered the consequences, he just wanted stuff so he torrented. He could have paid for it, but he didn't.

In another place I worked for I had a guy from a very rich shipping family ask me about torrenting stuff illegally (soz M8, not helping ya there). This guy could have afforded to buy the media remotely, say in the US (we were in the uk), and have each disk individually couriered to him cushioned between the warm thighs of high-class call girls. He had the money but he preferred to... be stupid I suppose.

How does it know whether certain IPs are static? It labels XS4ALL's residential range correctly as static but surely the owners of this site didn't investigate a random Dutch ISP to find out whether they rotate IP addresses. Is there s registry for this sort of thing? It's not in the whois info that I can see.

I’m also curious whether this is legal in the Netherlands. Certainly strange that it’s encouraging me to check on my neighbors to see what they’ve downloaded.

Of course, "The Man in the High Castle" would be the most pirated series in North Korea [1]!

[1]: https://iknowwhatyoudownload.com/en/stat/KP/annual/2020

The data is garbage, i am sure my IP did not changed and it shows things that I am sure nobody downloaded. I am wondering if the data is just randomly generated or the algorithm is just broken/guessing. You could create some stress for some people if such websites get credibility.

Who has access to your WiFi though, how do you know it's secure, do you check; perhaps an authorised person has some secrets from you.

An org name search would be great. I'm sure there are plenty of gems like this one. https://iknowwhatyoudownload.com/en/peer/?ip=204.68.207.14

So VPNs nowadays are meant to protect from this, but how can someone trust a VPN not to sell the details of what you've been downloading? Is it really worthwhile to use one when the VPN provider may actually in some cases be more likely to sell this data?

I mean, it pretty much comes down to how much you trust your VPN. Depending on your jurisdiction, trusting someone that is legally forced to keep logs vs some who's income and reputation depends on not doing so might the best bet (through VPNs definitely have survived giving out shady data).

Also, if your VPN is located somewhere exotic and just somewhat uncooperative, the bureaucratic overhead of getting the logs, getting the IP, sending the request to your VPN and then matching the result with your ISP might be long enough for the logs to expire.

> how can someone trust a VPN not to sell the details

you can't. but, you could use 2 nested vpn services, which would help if you can know that the 2 aren't affiliated with each other ... which you can't know.

i mean, it's hilarious that VPN services suggest privacy as one of their selling features. lol.

This thing seems pretty inaccurate. It says i tried to download fast five and Fast.And.Fierce.Death.Race. for under a second on july 1. fast and fierce is 720p and weighs in at only 800MB making it terrible quality so i know it wasn't me lol.

You probably have a dynamic IP address so someone else downloaded it on the address you are using now. I have a static IP and its showing all kinds of linux ISOs and other random crap that either I or someone else on the network downloaded.

My IP comes up clean, which is unsurprising because I don't use Bittorrent (at least not for piracy, anyway.) Even if you are going to torrent unscrupulously though, you may as well use a VPN or, if you can justify it, a seedbox. Paying to pirate stuff alone is probably a bit illogical, but OTOH having a VPN for general usage is probably wise for any questionable P2P things. (I am not affiliated or anything but I always feel obliged to throw a recommendation for Mullvad in that regard. Even if you don't care about VPNs, they do some pretty interesting stuff, like working on Coreboot for a server platform.)

Someone commented that it almost feel impossible because of how stupid some of these situations are. I did tell my entire department,staffed with primarily young people, who just started their professional lives,that private mode in browser will not stop the company ( or me personally) from finding out what they are browsing. The horror on se of those faces!:) Then I did repeat it again to make sure everyone got it. And then, someone asked " and what about our mobiles connected to WiFi?". Yes,those too. Every single website.

It was worth the VPN investment I guess.

I also have a VPN but guess what, my torrents are nicely showing. I've recently been using BiglyBT, a clone of the old Azureus torrent client. But apparently if something is wrong with the SOCKS proxy, BiglyBT defaults simply skipping the proxy :(

Eh, this site is bullshit. It just lists random content in a scareware fashion.

I’ve already tried it from a few different IPs, and not only did it list none of what I actually torrent, but it also listed shit I’ve never even heard of before. Mostly porn. And identical content across different IP’s (home static and cell LTE).

As in, I don’t torrent through my phone, and even on that (wifi turned off) I got a list of torrents with a completely different listed IP.

Is this supposed to be a hoax?

Just tried my home Internet, static IP, secure WiFi, in COVID lockdown, so no visitors.

Myself and my wife only (besides a toddler and baby). Wife doesn't normally use a computer (just mobile) and has no clue how to torrent. Site claims we torrented some MP3 three days ago; I had to Google the name of the artist.

If it's not a hoax then my best bet is some seriously impressive JS malware on a site my wife visited.

Does seem extraordinarily unlikely though.

It's based on IP addresses. If your ISP recycles yours, it could very well be another customer that got your current IP days ago.

No you don't, there might be one I dowloaded in there but most of them were definitely not downloaded by me (and no one in my house). I guess that's a good side of getting a very dynamic IP from my ISP...

And yes I know, that doesn't mean I'm protected from getting into trouble if I did something wrong since my ISP could probably link an IP and timestamp to me if asked by a lawyer.

I think it is malfunctioning. I’m sure I downloaded some Linux ISO files and all I see is a blank list. I have a static IP4 and IP6 connection

It's not malfunctioning, it's that monitoring all torrents in the world is not as easy as it looks.

Still, using a VPN remains the safe option. My IP is as clean as a CPU factory.

It says I "like porn", but the porn torrents it shows are not thing I've ever downloaded. I don't download porn at all. It shows things I've torrented, but the list is very inaccurate. I sure hope law enforcement doesn't one day decide to use the same information source and frame me for viewing something I didn't.

I can't speak to every LEO but the gist in US law at least is that IP != person, unless some other outside proof corroborates it is. You could in theory be framed but it probably wouldn't hold up court. It definitely could throw you into court, though, and that can be damaging enough.

This part is outright creepy:

> We cooperate with Right Holders, Law Offices, Internet Service Providers, Advertising Agencies and National Police. We provide information about sharing/downloading content via Bittorrent Network all over the world.

It's one thing to collect this as some sort of research, but another to feed MAFIAA [1] with this data to make their job easier. The fact that they process the data without disclosing who they actually are doesn't make it any less fishy. Doesn't it violate GDPR or something?

1: http://mafiaa.org/

I'm struggling to understand what's creepy about this. If seeing your entire download history on that website was shocking, that's really more a measure of how much you know you've been breaking the law than anything else: there is no PII anywhere in what this service does, it just retains information about which IP (which on its own doesn't identify anyone in the slightest) was seen connected to which torrent payload (which on its own doesn't imply actual data exchange happening).

Is that acronym deliberate? "Are we the baddies"?

s/you/yourIpAddress/

IP addresses are not people

This is why I am only using torrents in I2P.

How slow is it ?

My oh my... I seem to have downloaded a lot of torrents on my phone.

And I have such eclectic tastes.

Shared IPs are still very much a thing you know...

Conversely, mine doesn't show anything even though I have a static IP and download frequently...

odd.

Here's your free startup idea: content owners create targeted advertising based on real-time torrent downloads. The ad is a one-time use stream link in the local user's currency for a reasonable fee. Not realistic for implicitly condoning the download, but it would make me a huge fan of the company.

You want to actually kill piracy? You need two things, and probably either one of them would work on its own, too:

1. A streaming service with a reasonable monthly fee that has all movies and TV, not sharded between multiple different services.

2. The ability to buy and download movies and TV shows, DRM free, for a reasonable one-off fee. I know that the entertainment industry is allergic to no DRM, but I promise you, if they did this, piracy would go down, not up.

i picked a random PIA Montreal Node (which supports Port forwarding) for some interesting results: https://iknowwhatyoudownload.com/en/peer/?ip=199.229.249.191

“MommyBlowsBest.18.10.31.Marie.Mccray.Story.Time.XXX.SD.MP4-KLEENEX”

Haaaarrrr

How does it work? Do you connect to every open tracker in the planet and store all the IPs they give you?

AFAIK this site only uses DHT (Distributed Hash Table) sniffing to track IPs.

Disable DHT in the torrent client settings.

Somewhat surprisingly, it finds nothing for mine (likely some rando IP from my ISP... though that only makes it more surprising).

I'm not sure what conclusion to draw from this. Am I not torrenting enough? Do blocklists work? Did my ISP recently acquire an Amish IP block?

Neat, now I know what everyone using my vpn provider has downloaded!

I will happily recommend that everyone buy a router that can be flashed and pipe all your traffic through a VPN. It doesn't give you perfect security, but it defeats a lot of attempts to deanonimize like this.

For reference that is not a fool proof model.

Even if you do everything right all your traffic goes through VPN...

This create a case where the “bad thing” you do woth the PC, is also on the same address as all your “good things”.

Let’s say with Google, your thermostat, your Wi-Fi enabled coffee maker, your game console, your phone, every website you connect to with any other device that runs through that router/VPN - they all know your VPN IP at that time and your account info at that time.

Let’s say your WiFi refrigerator mfg sells IP and account detail information as a service to a data mining company - as I’m certain some do - in order to “get around” your home VPN, someone might need relatively cheap access to this data.

Putting everything on a VPN gives a lot of devices and accounts to tattle on you.

A VPN for the PC alone might be a decent idea if you are downloading things on the PC.

Since I go through a VPN, I'm more accurately seeing what other people who use my same VPN are torrenting. Surprisingly not as much porn as I would have guessed?

A pity that the output columns seem to be fixed, or else I could probably do some fun analysis.

This appears to be scraping the distributed public peer mechanism (PEX), distributed torrent metadata distribution system (DHT) and public tracker announces (which, by necessity, contain peer IPs for locating other members of a swarm).

I always find it funny to see what shows up when I switch to mobile and see what gets tracked via CG-NAT.

As a Canadian, I guess others have much much much better plans that I do. We pay $5-$10/go here. Maybe telecom employees get unlimited plans?

We were hosting an Au Pair from sweden. One day comcast sent us an email saying our IP address had been used to illegally download content.

I confronted her about it, and she lied denying it was her.

Needless to say, we never received another complaint.

Off topic: I was trying to see the comments for this link - there are 258 of them apparently - but all I can see, in multiple browsers, is 1 comment from "flak48". No other HN topics are behaving like this.

I switched my phone off of wifi to cellular and got some entertaining results

Great idea, Ads have to go from the top. It made using the tool with interest turn into a negative experience.

If ads must exist, they should be at the bottom where users, after being delighted can decide to click on it.

Hilariously I hadn't even heard any of the things listed and I even went through the whole subnet!

I think if anything this website is a good illustration of how IP =/= person and should never be assumed it is.

Interesting, for the dynamicish ip my ISP gives me nothing at all. Turn on my cheapo vpn provider and rather a lot.... Virtually all video both clean and dirty, tiny amount of music, no apps at all.

Just checked on our company vpn. Sure enough, someone has been downloading gigabytes. The legal issues are one thing, but screwing up the speed and stability of our shared internet is even worse!

Opened this junk from my home ip. Site says I (or somebody from my address) downloaded several soapy shit. It's pretty stupid to say that "you downloaded" those movies. First of all, torrenting is hell expensive in most of Europe. In Germany any ISP will immediately pass every bit of information they have about you to companies like ip-eschelon (and others who talking lawyer-ish) after first letter with mention of piracy. Next letter will land in your mailbox and resulting summ will surprise you. If you have lawyer insurance of personal lawyer, total pay me be decreased but not avoided. So, I will ask author of this site to avoid this kind of provoking stressful and insulting and puzzling wording.

I'm on dynamic IP, so it doesn't show me anything relevant. Only an update for World of Tanks downloaded a week ago... I haven't played World of Tanks in three years.

Joke's on you. I'm behind CGNAT.

Joke's on me. I'm behind CGNAT.

This is why all torrenting should be done with a throw-away device (ie. cheap second-hand android device) on a public internet access point (ie: the library or a coffee shop).

Jokes on you, my ISP has double NAT and I'm pretty sure 1000s are sharing my IP. Good luck finding what I download.

Sadly it's also the same thing that I absolutely hate about my ISP.

So NAT is happening before the connection comes into your house? Typically double NAT happens because your ISP does not allow that to be disabled on their modem and you have your own router hooked up through lan.

Someone who use the same VPN as me really loves classical music.

Piracy benefits us all.

It brings art and knowledge to millions that wouldn't otherwise have access to it.

The rest of society benefits indirectly too, by having these enriched persons in their midst.

> I Know What You Download on BitTorrent

No, they don't. They don't know anything I've torrented.

I've been using the same _private_ tracker for about a decade. 10 TB downloaded.

Obviously stupid to use work resources to do it. But from home there simply are no real repurcussions. You get a letter and it goes in the trash with no followup.

I like connecting through a VPN and then refreshing the page

I use a VPN on my home network and do not see any records via this website.

Am I missing something, or is my impression that this tool can “see through” tunneled traffic false?

You're not missing anything, this service shouldn't be able to see it if it's through a VPN. If you're connected to your VPN when you check, then it might be able to see what is going through that server, which of course might not be you (if you're using a commercial/shared VPN server).

interesting, I have not downloaded anything from my IP address. Also, my partner has doesn't even know the existence of the Bittorrent. Yet, we have a list of all kinds' of interesting files that we have apparently downloaded. Either someone is using our IP address to download things by hijacking our wifi, or something else is going on. As far as I know we don't share our IP, something to investigate here.

I've got a fair number of torrents I've been seeding for who knows how long.

And this site says I don't have anything.

I don't use a VPN, but I use an invite-only tracker.

The site is indeed very inaccurate, and I'm not using private trackers. Seeing as there is a previous HN thread about it 6 months ago, it should have some historic data in which I occur... it just doesn't capture everything.

The good news is that it doesn't see any of my private tracker linux downloads and since I only download linux on private trackers the list is empty.

Meta-question: There are supposedly 274 comments on this article as I write this, yet I can see only 1. Is this an error? Has the discussion been locked?

I also experienced this, the footer was missing as well. I tried from different devices and there was only one comment. I'm not sure how long it lasted but at least a few minutes, seems back to normal now.

I also ran into he same issue! First HN bug I've come across in years.

I just checked from my (government) building’s connection and, well...someone has been downloading some Lovecraftian horror movies. Not what I expected.

Uh Oh looks like one of Trump's interns is using cracked software and pirating movies

https://iknowwhatyoudownload.com/en/peer/?ip=204.68.207.14

There's also one porn entry:

https://iknowwhatyoudownload.com/en/peer/?ip=204.68.207.18

“Executive Office Of The President"

Haaaarrr!

Tried it from my phone. I guess cool to see people torrent from their mobile connections? I'd have to ask for a loan in order to do that.

IP being dynamic, I don't really know how this affect end users. The list for my (current) IP shows a bunch of stuff I never downloaded.

I tried connecting to NordVPN and loading up this page. Hundreds of results show up, and surprisingly less than half of it is pornography.

Guess they don't know about private trackers.

I torrented CentOS 8 in December; I must have been given another DHCP address since then, since the site shows an empty list for me.

According to the results, they know what a housemate of mine downloaded... I don't think I'll bring it up in conversation.

I had nothing for my actual home IP, but if you want to see something fire up your VPN and see what they have listed for that IP ;)

Had to try it, surprisingly zero porn?!?

Actually...for a free wireguard server there wasn't a whole lot of bittorrent traffic at all.

My current VPN endpoint has a dude who downloaded an unfortunate number of things about Adolph Hitler. :(

Not really. It shows what people using my current VPN exit have downloaded. And seriously, TPB warns people to use VPN services.

How does this work? I thought the whole idea of the torrent protocol was to prevent identification of who downloads what.

Not sure where you got that idea, maybe you're mixing up torrents with Tor or with gray area VPN services that people use while torrenting to anonymize themselves.

The whole reason you can google "____ Torrent" and get results is because there are torrent trackers out there that, well, track which IP addresses have which files. The same thing that allows those to exist allows someone to watch and record who is downloading which torrents. Which is what movie studios and the like are doing as well when they send out copyright warnings based on torrenting.

On the contrary. It is extremely easy to know the IP addresses of all downloading. This is a major problem in PeerTube as well, as you can know what videos someone watch. I'm not up-to-date with this, but last I checked, this was still unsolved.

The point of the protocol is to distribute data efficiently. It has nothing to do with privacy. Maybe you’re thinking of Tor?

you should forget whatever you read and start over :)

The purpose of it is exactly to help you find other peers with the same content. It's a bunch of peer finding protocols on top of each other. Trackers, DHT, peer xchange, etc, etc

I mean, the data itself is all hashes, but very public hashes. Unless you hashed it yourself and shared only the hash ever, the reverse hash is a websearch away.

This list must be violating integrity-policies and be illegal. This is similar to publishing DNS look-ups related to IP.

How is this usable in any legal system ? There is a huge difference between downloading content and clicking on a link.

Interesting - I have a fixed IP at home and this shows me having downloaded a Debian ISO recently, which is correct.

Might be worth keeping in mind that carrier grade NAT and dynamically allocated addresses are both pretty common.

List is blank for me, but definitely shouldnt be, so no it definitely does not know what I download on BitTirrent.

a) this is creepy b) I have wondered this... you know those letters some ISPs send to people telling them what they downloaded illegally? Do they send that stuff to VPN providers? Because it seems like they would just get flooded. I connected to my VPN service and there are thousands on that IP range.

The ISP is looking for IP addresses in its address range in the peer list, looking it up in its customer database, and sending its own customers a letter.

Too bad my place is assigned behind layers of NAT, ( or basically CGNAT ) which is basically useless to trace.

This mostly shows me what other customers of my VPN in various countries like to download.

I'm on a personal 4G sim wifi router currently and the results are completely wrong.

It's unlikely that you have a personal public IP from a telecom provider. Everyone connecting to the same tower(s) will share that IP.

Great, you just reminded me of my favourite trash TV series which is stuck at 80% :(

It is interesting. I was expecting to see blue data leak, but nothing showed up.

I have not downloaded any of these, how are these associated with my IP address?

If your internet provider dynamically assigns IP addresses, they may have been downloaded by people who previously had your current IP address.

You don't have a fixed IP.

It shows the linux distros I have torrented but not any piracy lol

Oh, I thought it filtered out legal content. Doubly confused why it doesn't know anything I have since I've left my very infrequently changing public IP seeding arch linux isos reasonably often.

That "Track Downloads" feature seems highly unethical.

Why does this appear with 272 comments but I can only see one?

Just checked while on mullvad, that's a lot of porn....

Interesting... shows me a list of things I didn’t download!

Makes me glad I have never been tempted to use BitTorrent.

Not really with carrier grade NAT that has a dynamic IP.

How does BitTorrent handle Carrier level NATs with IPv4?

Depends on one of two factors: 1. Does the CGNAT use EIM for TCP or UDP? 2. Does it, your CPE and your torrent client implement PCP or forward UPnP mappings as PCP?

This is honestly fascinating if you're a VPN user.

I can only see one comment for some reason?

Funny it categorizes Big Buck Bunny as XXX.

blackarch-linux-live-2020.06.01-x86_64.iso 14.37GB

I'm totally outed.

Those other IPs in my subnet do like their porn. Well, someone's porn.

...last summer.

Does this really work?

Not seeing any torrents of mine.

The info on my IP is not correct lmao

It matched my downloads 100%. Wow.

It has things I didn’t download.

Regretting that static IP now :)

doesn't work for me ..

Thanks for recommendations

Completely innacurate information and doesn't even know what is being torrented right now.

haha, no you don't.

No you don't. :)

VPN is working :)

> nothing

nice :sunglasses:

just check it out mine then :P

Completely innacurate information.

lol....no you don't

not working

Apparently not.

weird

Ouch... my town is on the same IP range, so I can see my neighbours' activity. I could probably even tell who it is.

On the up side, static IP makes it easy to quite reliably host stuff on my own computers, in my home.

I wonder how this API could work in terms of travel prep. If you wanted to watch the most torrented films in a given city before coming, seems like it could work out well.

With encryption, if anyone join as a peer NOT to join the torrent distribution, is that considered computer hacking under the DMCA?

I currently have 44 active torrents, this site doesn't show any of them, none of my friends torrents either. Cool concept tho.

Looks like my neighbors are huge fans of some nasty pr0n.

Is Torrent still a thing? I'm not sarcastic here, just not downloading music since Napster. Is it common for you to install a torrent client on your machine?

Mostly for Linux ISOs. :-)

Reply on news.ycombinator.com