Which part of “unconditional” do you not understand?
Which part of “unconditional” do you not understand?
In theory you should be able to come up with some minimal necessary set of laws and policies, pass apropriate parlimentary bills once, and after that parliament becomes unncecessary, or maybe it just gathers in session once a year, to evaluate the need for new laws.
Also, to encourage long-term thinking it should be written into Constitution that any new law passed can only take effect 10 years after it was passed, not sooner.
The income tax was temporary. Right?
Consider someone hired to normalize something that is already being done. You dont need to tell them. Just pay them. Current example: https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/weird-news/hunting-humans-set-...
Heck make movies about it. Pro/con is irrelevant in the early stages.