Jeffrey Epstein court documents are improperly redacted; many names visible

twitter.com

37 pointswaffle_ss2 comments

Looks like the original requires paying a fee [1].

It would be interesting to run a diff of the original and the redacted.

[1] https://pacer.uscourts.gov/pricing-how-pacer-fees-work

On top of the torrent in the Twitter link, are these originals? I think this site gets filled as people contribute?

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4355835/giuffre-v-maxwe...

I was surprised to see outright un-redacted email addresses and phone numbers there, I would have thought x-chan would quickly be running them against know dumps.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com