It’s not about privatizing the service, it’s about disrupting their ability to process mail in ballots for the election.
If they wanted to privatize it, they could have don’t it at any time during the past four years.
If they wanted to privatize it, they could have don’t it at any time during the past four years.
Yes it is.
> it’s about disrupting their ability to process mail in ballots for the election.
True, but those are complementary not mutually exclsuive motivations.
I don't think either of those motivations is okay, in fact, I think the action being taken on either basis alone would be, and a fortiori them being taken with both motivations is, a serious abuse of executive power.
I don't play along with excuses. As I said, if it was really about that, they had numerous opportunities in the past four years.