Only where it's applicable. A meal planner company that has a logo that looks little like an apple logo doesn't really fall into this. If it was a phone shop then sure, but this is well outside of the needs-to-because-law scope and into the bullying scope.
Even if it were a phone shop there's zero chance of confusion, this is a frivolous suit and purposeful waste of court time.
Fuck that, trademark law is broken if it requires something that "looks like" bullying. It's just bullying with some flimsy justifications.