I'm sorry? What?!
The vast majority of Apple's customers are Apple fans, people who merely wish to think different, nothing more, nothing less.
Edit: Don't downvote just to disagree. Comment and state your reasoning on why you think I'm wrong. If you work for a company that only issues Apple devices, please speak up with your experience on how this went, and, if possible, why the company didn't go with Windows or Linux computers instead.
For the comments that try to bring up software development roles: most software developers I know either use Windows or use Linux on the desktop, and loath OSX worse than I do. Very few prefer OSX.
The few people I know that prefer OSX (and will die on that hill) are frontend developers.
I wouldn't go so far as to say that this is proof that "Apple's main clientele is business", but it certainly wouldn't surprise me. And it's not true that offices don't allocate Apples to workers.
It even happened at Microsoft until the Surface program was finally given a proper go ahead by Nadella. A lot of former MBP users seem to love the Surfacebook, so they succeeded in making a functional yet veblen good in the same vein that a MBP is.
https://www.macrumors.com/2020/06/29/apple-rosetta-2-a12z-be...
Apparently, a Surface with a Ryzen 4800U exists and is coming out really soon.
The comparison isn't realistic because Apple's acquisition of PA Semi was a brilliant move, and no one makes an ARM that is anywhere near that level of performance, not even Qualcomm. I agree with Apple's decision to put their ARM on the desktop as their answer to the Intel dilemma.
In this case, an ARM vs ARM comparison is not an apples to apples comparison, Apple does not license their design to anyone else, ergo, the only way to make a fair comparison is to use the best commonly available part, which currently, is Zen 2 parts.
I expect a Zen 2 to crush a 2 year old Apple ARM, but I also expect a future Apple desktop and laptop design to keep up with Zen 3. I actually hope Apple can win the fight, but I also wish Apple would license their CPU to other manufacturers to promote the general adoption of more architectures in this space.
As far as Surface sells.
https://appleinsider.com/articles/19/10/24/editorial-why-mic...
That is one of the most absurd takes I have ever seen by an Apple hater. Even haters usually acknowledge that Macs are used extensively in software development, scientific research, film editing, design work, and education. And Apple is the fourth largest PC maker in the world, so they’re also used just about everywhere else at least a little bit.
What are you doing on this website because you clearly don't work in software.
> Please don't comment about the voting on comments. It never does any good, and it makes boring reading.