> Preventing trademark erosion.
> However, they don't seem to have good grounds for it in this case.
Does that mean this is just suing companies for the sake of suing?
Does that mean this is just suing companies for the sake of suing?
Other valid possibilities:
- They don't agree with me on the first point.
- Someone followed an un-nuanced SOP.
- They expect a strategic benefit from this kind of attitude.
- People are making choices from a job-security perspective rather than a greater good (or even greater good of the company) perspective.
- ...