This lawsuit isn’t being filed by drivers, according to the article it’s being filed by “the California Attorney General Xavier Becerra, along with city attorneys of Los Angeles, San Francisco, and San Diego”.

I mean drivers may or may not prefer freelancing, and certainly Uber will say whatever supports their case, but I don’t think the State suing Uber proves what drivers want in any way.

Short answer is no. This lawsuit, and particularly this motion for preliminary injunction, was filed by the State of California--not drivers.

>Doesn't this lawsuit prove otherwise?

No, you can have a lawsuit for anything and from anyone. All this article suggests is that some Uber/Lyft drivers want to work as full time employees.

In the case of this suit, it was filed by the California government, not drivers.