It's fantastic and I now I prefer it to Lightroom (Although I haven't used the latest version of Lightroom).
It's fantastic and I now I prefer it to Lightroom (Although I haven't used the latest version of Lightroom).
That said I shot a model this week and went back to trying to use Dark-table to go over the results as quickly as possible, it was actually pretty efficient to rate the images.
(In an hour-long shoot I'd taken about 500 images, and it was painless to look at each RAW file and star the ones that I wanted to keep. I went through everything and ranked about 50 as three-stars, then after a bit of thought and coffee marked the 25 I was going to hand over to her as 5 stars which I could then later process and edit with rawtherapee afterwards.)
This got me interested. Care to elaborate?
Keeping my own structure is one reason why I don't use any software that won't work "in-place". So I chose rawtherapee because I can point it at a directory of raw images, get a set of JPGs out, and it won't try to move/file/organize them behind my back.
Anyway my structure looks something like:
/srv/
/srv/images/
/srv/images/2020
/srv/images/2020/08/
/srv/images/2020/08/05.Claire
/srv/images/2020/08/05.Claire/RAW
/srv/images/2020/08/05.Claire/JPG
/srv/images/2020/08/05.Claire/Results
/srv/images/2020/08/12.Sanna
..
Basically data-based, but I also create a ".info" directory beneath each per-person tree which will have: location=Blah
event=Random Shot|Birthday|Party|Event
date=05.08.2020
tags=model,claire,monochrome
theme=pirate
contact=phone-number|email|address
..
Then I have a shell-script that lets me search for all shoots which had a specific location, tag, name, or similar.