That's an absurd take. Lots of politicians have long tenures because they've won re-election. That is not the same as suspending elections.
Like Kim Jong-un? Who wins every re-election with 100% of the vote?
Clearly one should care about the fairness of the election process, not that someone wins lots of elections. To say that winning multiple elections is the same as ending democracy is, as I said, an absurd take.