No, this is just business. Brigade has a duty to its investors to fight tooth and nail to keep this money, just like a defense lawyer has a duty to use every advantage for the client allowed under the law, acquired intentionally or otherwise.
What kind of duty? Not a legal one, I think.
It's like a natural process to these companies. Most likely CITI is getting it back. But it's probably a worthy gamble on the lawyering fees.
Frankly, the entire chunk of money should be considered legally tainted until legal action is resolved; which means escrow it somewhere and unleash the lawyers.
All of a sudden, we may see some consideration given to proper verification ( not just quick rubber stamp ).
Even if Revlon goes under because the courts pull what I'd call a derp, it should create the illustrative case that creates a business niche for higher reliability/risk financial transactions.