Hacker News Reader

Comment by baby | Hacker News Reader

I actually see this rhetoric a lot, and I'm not completely disagreeing with it, but at the same time I'm scared of the effects of playing the same game with the CCP and the ramifications of such move: it seems to always end up in a "us versus them" scenario which further divides the world. If you see a few people backing the US government's decision of attacking Chinese apps, imagine how the Chinese people are being brainwashed to hate on the US gov for attacking Chinese apps. IMO it is only with leading by example that we can change the situation, and the situation will change when China gets wealthy enough, and we shouldn't be scared of China becoming wealthy and joining our ranks.

View on HN

US could definitely do a better job of leading by example here while still fighting for a more level playing field.

I don't like the idea of trusting the executive branch to arbitrarily ban apps. Would much prefer a clear policy as to when and why actions are taken, and what policy changes could be done to avoid them altogether.

Seems like you'd bring about the opposite though. In a cooperate-defect scenario, it only ends in the defector's win.

Free trade only works if it goes both ways. Otherwise you're just screwing yourself to benefit your now opponent.

Is there benefit to setting an example that Chinese citizens would never see anyways?

believe me they see it, a couple years back you could ask Chinese people in the street what they thought of Americans and a lot would answer that they like the fact that they are more "free" and "open minded". There's a bunch of videos like that on youtube [1][2]. Nowadays I don't think people would say the same stuff[3].

[1]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1gqXLxCU-fY

[2]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I_E38TJpU6Q&t=451s

[3]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pOlu624glKw&t=432s

it doesn't matter. chinese citizen opinion doesn't matter to the chinese govt. Western companies lose by trying to play fair against the chinese companies. This is all in accordance with game theory. By trying to be nice, we will be wiped out. The only choice we have now is to fight dirty like them.

You may be surprised to find out how much Chinese citizen opinions matter to the Chinese Govt. State-sponsored censorship (like the one in RPC) exists to meddle with public opinions. Denial of access to information is a mean, not an end. Artificial consents are being manufactured via the media on both sides. Just done differently, largely because one way is more cost-efficient and cost-effective than the other in terms of the place’s GPD per capital.

$10,262 [65th in the world] vs $65,111 [7th] (IMF, 2019)

Regimes collapse due to their people’s will.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com