How about "X is insecure, flaky, unsupported, and solves problems nobody actually has"? Such is the considered opinion of just about anybody who knows spit about the Linux graphics stack. Hint: The major Wayland devs are former Xorg devs.
In the second case, those applications work well with X security extensions and X11 proxies so I'm pretty fine in that regard, even with X11.
And since X11 also works just so much better in the majority of cases I care about, regarding my productivity and flexibility, I don't see any reason to use Wayland right now.
In theory I'd like to move to Wayland, but X solves my problem which is "I want to see windows, some of them accelerated".
But notably, major Xorg developer Keith Packard is missing from that list.