It sounds a lot like you are deliberately seeking bias-confirming right wing propaganda!
If youtube wants to disable comments, throw up warnings or blur out gore then fine but suppressing media from a highly politically charged situation is a mistake.
What truth is this you are so deprived of? I presume you have some "real" source of truth that's more reliable than media that fact-checks itself and issues corrections?
oh boy. I'm not even going to start in on this one. If you actually believe any of the "fact checks" done by your favourite news outlet, instead of going out and doing a lot of research from a bunch of different sources and viewing the full actual video of events in context, you're not getting the right picture; not even remotely the right picture.
We've never had a media that's more blatantly bias and unreliable than the one we have right now.
> We've never had a media that's more blatantly bias and unreliable than the one we have right now.
Can you provide a citation or evidence of this claim?
I don't think everything from the documentary should be taken at face value, but it's still incredibly valuable in learning how the narrative has been so insanely skewed today.
That movie is by and for Mike Cernovic's existing audience. It was crowd funded by his audience, produced by his production company, and promoted on far-right websites where he contributes. The producers and directors appear to be mostly info-wars style far-right propagandists. Event the glowing IMDB reviews describe it as "preaching to the choir".
The project of Hoaxed is to create false equivalency between the misdeeds of the larger media industry, and the specific business model of promoting far-right misinformation that people like Cernovic engage in.
edit: I broadly agree with this guys take on the movie [1], which he expresses at greater length and clarity than I am presently able.
[1] https://lawrenceserewicz.wordpress.com/2020/04/16/initial-re...