Followup on the star torn apart by a black hole: Hubble picture
blogs.discovermagazine.com
blogs.discovermagazine.com
What happens when stars go "boom" in some way is just insanely huge compared to anything we're familiar with.
Makes me think of some guy like Feynman sitting in a room with others thinking up and arguing over accretion discs, tides, and how much solar units of mass _that_ black hole must have.
We've come a long way since Copernicus and still have so very far to go.
As it happens, the disk that formed around the black hole was face-on to us, so one of those beams was essentially aimed directly at us.
Anyone know just how focused these beams are?
The breakup of the star would form an accretion disc, the jets would form at the axis of rotation. The formation of the jets are classically mechanical (conservation of angular momentum by various means) and so the focus of the jet depends on the speed of the matter being ejected, the amount of matter being ejected and the mass of the black hole.
Moreover, the matter falling into the black hole is heated to plasma level and so there is very strong magnetic activity. As the accretion disc spins, the magnetic field lines twist along the axis of rotation - the same axis as the ejected matter. This has the upshot of focusing the jets very tightly.
[ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cromulent#Embiggen_and_cromulen... ]
It's about a posthuman society's reaction to a GRB in their vicinity, and its basically one long thought experiment about the various consequences of the human race abandoning corporeal existence.