Out of curiosity, what do you believe to be the correct nationality?
Out of curiosity, what do you believe to be the correct nationality?
Now, perhaps you would consider that we ought to demand people's "nationality" be an actual UN member state which counts them as a citizen and since Tibet isn't a member... That's a bit awkward though because the "One China" policy ensures neither the Republic (in Taiwan) nor the PRC will allow the other to be a UN member at the same time as them.
Also I find that I doubt we demand most people have documentary proof. Not taking their word for it is already a bit weird unless you're a border official. Is Samantha Bee really Canadian? I mean, she says she is so I just assumed...
Actually, 90+% of the population of the ROC, including their leaders, would be ecstatically happy to be an UN member separately from the PRC. The only reason they officially have a "One China policy" is that the PRC has made it clear that while they can tolerate the status quo of a rival government with zero prospects of actually challenging them controlling a small piece of their territory, they will very much not tolerate that piece of territory to become officially independant and provide an example for at least half a dozen others.
Obviously being in exile I have no idea what passport he carries of if he gets to issue his own given he contends the current government, etc.
https://mobile.twitter.com/DanielDumbrill/status/12992582723...
I think that rumors of cultural oppression in Tibet have been vastly exaggerated
[1] https://portal1.passportindia.gov.in/AppOnlineProject/online...
With the Dalai Lama this point is particularly interesting, because his life is an ongoing conversation with the Chinese (although at times they seem like two monologues).
I think what matters is whether the existence of an independent country is contested. No one contests non-existence of USSR but Tibetan case is not closed.
* verbose explanation why this might be disputed