Wow. Quote:
> But I can’t think of a prior case where the feds unambiguously acknowledged using Google search logs this way: to, apparently, zero in on people who searched the wrong word at the wrong time.
> But I can’t think of a prior case where the feds unambiguously acknowledged using Google search logs this way: to, apparently, zero in on people who searched the wrong word at the wrong time.
You can always make a slippery slope argument, but it doesn't make it reasonable.
What's the difference between a trend and a slippery slope?
Why/why not will scope increase in this particular way? What temptations are there? What safeguards are there?