Tear gas won’t manage gentrification and economic inequality, and overarching societal reform won’t manage a riot in progress.
Right tools for the job and all that...
Tear gas won’t manage gentrification and economic inequality, and overarching societal reform won’t manage a riot in progress.
Right tools for the job and all that...
[0] https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2020/07/31/portland-pr...
[1] https://www.theverge.com/2020/6/2/21278285/peaceful-protest-...
[2] https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/06/26/opinion/blm-p...
[3] https://www.cnn.com/2020/06/19/opinions/aggressive-police-pe...
[4] https://www.vox.com/2020/6/12/21279619/protesters-police-vio...
[5] https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/police-keep-using-fo...
[0] https://www.forbes.com/sites/andrewsolender/2020/06/03/all-t...
[1] https://www.newsweek.com/nypd-sergeants-benevolent-associati...
[2] https://www.thedailybeast.com/norman-oklahoma-councilwoman-a...
It’s impossible not to see an obvious strategy of police provocation, hilariously on display in [2], but tear gas as a tactic to disperse groups of people can’t seriously be argued not to work, as shown in that very same [2].
[0]: “...the protests largely ended the same way for days: with tear gas, rubber bullets and arrests.”
[1]: “The vast majority of people began to disband, while some stayed behind to continue protesting.”
[2]: “Minutes later, the march ended in chaos as the police lobbed flash-bang grenades and sprayed the protesters with tear gas and pepper spray.”
[3]: focused on strategy
[4]: ‘officers have met peaceful protesters...with disproportionate and brutal force, often for no reason but to “disperse” a crowd.’
[5]: focused on effects of tactics
The people being dispersed won’t always be peacefully protesting injustice, and the police themselves won’t always be the subject at hand.
I also specifically mentioned it as a tool for managing a riot in progress, not provoking the current protests occurring across the US.