Until they understood that it could be spread by asymptomatic carriers -- at which point (In mid March), they fully recommended them. There are far bigger 'jokes' who are still denying mask wearing and other interventions are saving lives.
(I have a workshop long stocked with both disposable surgical and N95 masks and reusable P100 masks/cartridges, so I have no skin in the game.)
I don't think their credibility should be negatively impacted for updating their advice with the latest science. It's a shame people are reading it in the most negative light possible.
As a scientist, my answer to “should we wear masks?” wouldn’t have been to deflect to contaminated surfaces - even setting aside that subsequent research showed that to be largely a non-issue.