Probably. You tell us :=)
The incompatibility is apparently due to the fact that jq is happy with a concatenation of JSON objects and q is not. For example {'foo':1}{'foo':2} as opposed to [{'foo':1},{'foo':2}]
The incompatibility is apparently due to the fact that jq is happy with a concatenation of JSON objects and q is not. For example {'foo':1}{'foo':2} as opposed to [{'foo':1},{'foo':2}]
I certantly didn't use it, but I see where it's useful, will implement it soon.
The comma operations means that the "filters" are duplicated, so instead of one json state you would pass two if there's one coma; and ofcourse any number of commas are allowed.