Hacker News Reader

Comment by _fx6v | Hacker News Reader

I have no idea why those chose Ethereum as a backing cryptographic protocol. It stains the project in my opinion.

I don't see it disrupting IP/DNS with cryptographic identities. I'd argue that Kademlia DHT does that in a more significant way.

Not really sure what Urbit does uniquely in that regard really.

I do crave some one-time use generated address that maps to a DHT/Kademlia cluster to provide deterministic privacy against p2p networks that doesn't depend on BGP autonomous centralized entities.

Know of anything like that out of curiosity? Ha.

View on HN

> I do crave some one-time use generated address that maps to a DHT/Kademlia cluster to provide deterministic privacy against p2p networks that doesn't depend on BGP autonomous centralized entities.

It's not "one time use", but I believe BrightID[1] might be of interest to you. It allows applications to verify that you're a real person without looking into all your metadata and such. And it's not tied directly to your finances, etc like some other ID solutions are.

[1]: https://www.brightid.org/

Ethereum is just used as consensus for key revocation and title transfer between galaxies. They don’t need to use Ethereum or can switch to another method of consensus, it’s just convenient at the moment to both distribute stars and planets and avoid having to build a blockchain or other method of consensus for the PKI.

DHTs do not have a solution to Sybil attacks. In reality, they depend on super nodes. That’s what Urbit’s spanning tree (galaxies/stars/planets) provides, a system of reliable routing. Nothing stops Urbit nodes from using a DHT to communicate, as the network protocol is addressed by identity.

Yggdrasil seems to solve that fine https://yggdrasil-network.github.io

It's not "Ethereum is just..."

Urbit is sacrificing accessibility by adding complexity which Ethereum is, on top of the reputation of what cryptocurrency is, while also additionally requiring the complexity of wallets and ERC-21 (or w/e it is these days) to prove you have address space.

That's bs in my opinion. It should be completely automated like Ygg does it and allow any peer to participate and connect and discover routing deterministically and dynamically.

I hear Urbit can switch at any time, yeah, easier said than done when you've built a lot of expectations on a significant piece of the stack including the wallet and auth parts which are pretty integral. Then shifting the conceptual model? Not likely.

After more thinking the solution I'm looking for is some hybrid between PJON/Yggdrasil

Reply on news.ycombinator.com