What happened to all the non-programmers? (2015)
benkuhn.net
benkuhn.net
- join the YMCA or other community gym:
It’s true that some of my experience could be related to Oakland as a whole, which is an exceptionally diverse city. But I’ve visited other gyms and workout facilities in my area, and none of them look anything like the YMCA. They all lack the wide range of age, race, gender, and ability. I’ve also visited YMCAs in other states, most recently in Michigan and North Carolina, and they had a very similar vibe to my own. I’ve come to conclude that whatever I lose out on from not going to an upscale or hyperspecialized gym, the YMCA makes up for, because it gives me a much broader sense of community and allows me to interact with people—in real life, no less—who I otherwise wouldn’t. Does this solve all of the world’s problems? Of course not. But I think it’s a small step in the right direction.
https://www.outsideonline.com/2403867/ymca-local-gyms-good-w...
- spend more time in civic spaces like libraries and public parks. Or just being outside in public with an open mind.
- speaking of civic involvement, active participation in your local government will for sure broaden your social circles.
- religious organizations -- at least, good ones -- are cross-sectional in this way too. Quoting MLK Jr, "... any [church] that violates the "whosoever will, let him come" doctrine is a dead, cold thing, and nothing but a little social club with a thin veneer of religiosity."
- community work, like habitat for humanity or the like, will put you in a new sphere of folks too.
Speaking to the content though; and it may seem dismissive or odd but: I tend to make friends with random people I meet. For instance going the extra mile to be friendly with service workers (remembering names, asking about family and following up later, generally having good memory for birthdays etc) has landed me a fair crop of friends.
People are rarely in the service industry long and they tend to be wildly different, person-to-person, and they have extended friend groups too which if you get very friendly may end up increasing your circles even further.
It sounds weird typing this out, like I consider them some kind of resource to be tapped, but what I'm trying to get across is to be kind to people and friendship will happen. I've never gone looking for friends and almost my entire friend group (outside of IRC) has nothing to do with tech.
Some of the people I was just friendly with and became friends with are now personal trainers, nutritionists, nurses and architects. It's almost a problem because we have very little in common, we can only share lamentation about things like open offices and the country we live in. :P
In general when I interact with service workers, we tend to be focused on the service at hand - there isn't very much spare time for making friends. And I can't help but feel they are being paid to be friendly. (I am not from the US, if this makes any difference)
Also, how much time would you say you spend with new friends? I find that between work, family, personal projects, and a stable of few but close friends, my time is pretty well spoken for. But the idea of having more friends is certainly a nice one.
I'm more than happy to answer, but it might sound sociopathic in isolation and without context. Also I used "service workers" as an example of people I interact with daily, but it can be anyone really and my point was more general.
Regarding my service worker friends specifically (usually they work at my local food places): if I go places more than once I'll ask how things are that day, if it was busy, if there's any time that is overly annoying, basic small talk stuff.
Maybe another day I'll ask their name, but I must have already asked a question on another day, so that a question like this doesn't come out of the blue.. it's a natural progression, and this is so that I can greet them by name next time I see them.
After I'm talking with names then I'll ask weird questions like if they had a favourite customer, maybe make a cheesy joke about it not being me because I'm annoying with questions.
Maybe later I'll ask if they have any family in the area, or something stupid about star signs. If their birth month is coming up I'll comment on it and make a mental note to bring it up later to figure out their birthday and get them some small gift.
Even later, if I have an event planned or something I'll invite them out- I always offer 2 or 3 different times/things before I stop offering, when/if they reject it can be a reason to ask more pointed questions about what they normally do as activity; the last time you offer you can suggest that they show you what they're interested in or something.
It helps that I genuinely care for the people I interact with, I really consider everyone a friend I haven't gotten to know yet.
I know it sounds formulaic, but it's not and I'm just recollecting.
As for hanging out, maybe once every 2 weeks? not sure, certainly not often. I have a girlfriend who is very demanding of my time.
And, for context, I live in Sweden, so- also not US. :)
My goal is for you to buy the things you want and get out of my store for you to come back another day. I won't be rude and I'll try my best to help you, but I don't take my customers home with me to have a beer because I like my work to be separate from the rest of my life.
Be really careful that you aren't abusing a captive audience when you do this.
If someone shows discomfort then you stop, if they were just caught off guard and want to continue to be friendly then they will instantiate the next conversation.
Just be friendly, don't be needy.
This can be a pleasure for both sides if done respectfully, I want to caution the reader that this walks a very fine line next to harrassment, particularly where the person you're interacting with is of a different gender. If it doesn't come naturally to you, don't try it.
> - live in San Francisco, Berkeley or Oakland
With those criteria, assuming you are in the tech field, you're probably making an order of magnitude more than your age-group peers.
It seems entirely reasonable that you wouldn't bump into the non-tech crowd since they can't afford the same lifestyle as you.
Over here in the Midwest, software jobs pay much more in line with other college-educated professions.
As a result, I'm the only programmer in my friend group, and most of the people make the same ballpark of money as I do.
I see a lot of job listings in the $80-$120k range.
That's pretty solid... I guess would be comparable to like $150k in a place like nyc?
This isn’t isolated to tech, it would apply to any insular community. To use a tech analogy, if you trained a machine learning model based on the preferences and viewpoints of only people who worked in tech, you’d end up with an overfitted and not very general model.
Your brain is trained on viewpoints you are exposed to as well, and you risk over fitting your brain to a narrow set of viewpoints if you never leave an insular community.
He could pick a hobby he doesn’t enjoy, but that would defeat the point of a hobby...
i spend all week dicking around with my fellow pedants solving fiddly problems. I don’t want to play board games or factorio all weekend because i want to have a weekend that feels like not-work.
Alternative worldviews are refreshing and rejuvinating.
I dont even care about the hive mind aspect, its the relentless tedium of 'rationality' that thrives amongst the type, its just not human to try to be "right" all the time.
It's just that the Bay Area is an economic district, that's all. There are districts in Europe where everyone is somehow involved in making pipes and faucets, others where everyone works in the clothing industry, even some where everyone is into the business of fantasy miniatures....
SF "makes bits", so chances are that if you throw a stone there you'll hit 3 developers, 2 "product guys", and 4 devops (insert a basement-dweller-sysadmin-joke here). I actually found it pretty exciting the few times I was over there - a land where nerds don't have to be ashamed of "being in IT"! Talking coding and gadgets over dinner is socially accepted! How refreshing!
Obviously there is a degree of class selection in place, but it was always such. Did your parents know a lot of homeless people or fruit-pickers? I wouldn't think so.
Not that long ago, I read a news story about a homeless guy. He used to be a pro baseball player.
So, I guess maybe my parents didn't know a lot of homeless people because they didn't play pro sports...
Which is to say, there's something odd about the way you see the world, or the way I do. One or the other.
Would that be Nottingham? ;)
I was visiting my grandparents a couple weeks ago and they were baffled at how young people never know their neighbours. And it is true. I know the one neighbour that has lived to the right of my parents house. Nowhere else that I have lived have I even known the names of the people across the hall.
I tend to just have 6 friends at any given time who consume 3 hours a day in total. There isn’t room for more people without sacrificing other conversations. And yes, most are software engineers/otherwise in tech.
1. dependent
2. independent
3. interdependent
I think when people are young, they're trying really hard to leave #1 behind and be #2... to the exclusion of #3.
#3 might be where you meet your neighbors.
* A grad student neuroscientist (which actually means "Matlab programmer")
* A statistician (which actually means "R programmer")
* Various other kinds of scientists and mathematicians, whose day-to-day work is actually programming
* A rabbi (who is applying to programming boot camps)
* A number of unemployed people, trying to learn to program in various ways (from self-study to degree programs to bootcamps)
Most of these would not be counted, but if I talked to them at a dinner party, I would count them as programmers.
Point being - for a good many people, given well-documented challenges of making adult friends, our work / industry creates a natural social circle.
Our best friends from outside those work circles came from when she ran an AirBnB back in the day and met people from all over the world.
A friend of mine was best friends with someone she sold a piece of crafting equipment to. Showed up and didn't leave for four hours.
If all you do is eat, sleep, and drink software, then you aren't going to know anybody outside of software. It's one of the things we mean when we say that doing software as a profession and your main hobby can be harmful.
Doing other things doesn't mean you never work on software outside of work. It means you do it when you have other things sorted out.
hit the gym and do some weight-lifting, solve two problems at once. Also just go out and hit the bars. (okay maybe not the greatest advice right now). Unlike the author my parents were solidly working class so I always was very aware of straddling two very different social circles, between academia and tech work and the people I grew up with. There's no reason to live in either bubble really and in a big city it's not that hard to have a healthy social circle, just requires leaving your comfort zone.
The author of this post is just a whiner. It's never been easier to meet people outside of your bubble than now.
I mean - now - like this year, probably pretty hard.
now - last few decades before this year, maybe so.
I’ve never met anyone at a gym or bar before. Other than hitting on girls at bars, I’ve never seen anyone else in my social circle meet anybody else at any gyms or bars. I’ve certainly never seen anyone approach me at a gym or a bar. Has your experience been much different?
I don’t mind leaving my comfort zone, but to do what, exactly?
Me neither, gym seems an especially weird place to meet people. Aren't most people at gyms just trying to get their workout in and get out? I can't imagine trying to strike up conversation at the gym. Feel like it would be like trying to start a conversation on public transport. Another big no no.
This is what I always thought too, but I've been told there is a very sizeable amount of people who actually go there to hook up. Still not a "make friends" situation though.
For example it could be martial arts, where getting to know your opponent is really important, and it can turn into friendship once the fight is over. Or maybe climbing, where there are many occasions to talk with others, maybe discussing your technique while you are resting between climbs. And of course, team sports.
Im at the point where, if someone happens to be in the same location at the same time as me, thats enough of an excuse to reach out to know them. If we share the same space each week, I should definitely reach out.
Over the last year I stayed with 9 people in 1 house. 2 school teachers, 1 in CSR, 1 lecturer, 1 grad student, 3 in tech (and only 1 in big-tech: Me) and 1 in pharmacy.
To-be-fair, I was in Boston . But, my peers ended up in far more homogeneous peer groups when they just stayed with people they knew or other 1/2 random strangers.
Pick-up sports or Adult-sports-leagues have worked well for this purpose too. I play(ed) soccer, but Basketball or the like would also work.
Lastly, just date someone not-in-tech. Dating apps are great for this. If it turns into a relationship, your partner will make sure their friends become your friends. It is a story as old as time. Although dating-outside-tech can be tricky for some. Not every group is as open to brutally honest and logic-1st/ empathy-2nd style of communication in tech.
That said, on this particular truck three people out of the crew of four were programmers. We thankfully pulled up the conversation about the merits of Jupyter Notebooks for BI tooling before the fourth crew member, who is studying forensics, got so bored her eyes rolled right out of her head.
If you don't want to be pigeon-holed as the stereotypical Tech worker ('the ones ruining SF'), then show you have other interests and qualities. Author has done a fine job of defining the edges of that particular mould. The fix is the same as the other comments - break the mould, get outside the comfort zone.
That's exactly something a programmer (or an academic) would say. I box and I hear the same words from my coworkers.
If you stopped treating your brain as the most important fucking organ in your body (not that it isn't), you might open yourself up to hobbies that emphasize other aspects of your person. You would probably meet new kinds of people in those activities.
And I'm pretty sure he could find plenty of other activities that don't involve a high risk of brain damage.
Amusingly enough, there's a USAFL team in San Francisco, although it's almost certainly full of programmers.
Jiu Jitsu is super popular most everywhere now, but Judo is really fun too, as well as wrestling. Striking sports are great as well, but you can't really go live in practice in a striking sport. You can spar in striking at 50% a few times a week (and that's pushing it), but you can roll at 100% in Jiu Jitsu up to every day. I always found the latter much more fun.
There are a few techies but it's rare, and those that are tend more towards management type roles that IC engineers.
Unfortunately theatre is likely the last industry that'll recover from covid but once it does I thoroughly recommend it.
That's going to screen most "families" out of your social circle and that's a LOT of people. Most folks (tech and non-tech) start getting pressured to have families by the age of 30.
However, the whole premise of the article is that only being surrounded by techies is bad. Why?
Would he feel the same if he was only surrounded by musicians?
Also, regularly socializing with non-programmers seems to be a check against some of the anti-social habits we're all prone to pick up
maybe, counter intuitively I was playing mtg in SF and didnt run into many programmers.
Dogs are NOT for everybody. Having a dog is a 10-15 years commitment and shouldn't be done by impulse, specially if you work from home. Could bark at 4AM, the owner will need to remove a lot of s*t and wake up early each day of the weeks, (Sundays also) and definitely can damage seriously your capability to focus in remote working from home.
But nothing prevents you to volunteer to walk a pooch or just borrow one once a month from a friend or grandma to go out and take a walk. A friendly middle sized dog will love to tell everybody how awesome is their father. Is the second best visiting card that a human can show after babies (Money would be the third).
I did not engineer this, nor do I have any particular interest in knowing a bunch of older, white men. It just happened that way, because my hobby is popular with this particular demographic. If the author is bothered by their lack of non-programmer friends, surely the easiest way to correct that would be to find a hobby that attracts a different sort of folk. That might not be a viable solution right now due to COVID restrictions, but we're not going to all be stuck in our homes forever.
And I guess they don't talk to anyone outside of engineering at their workplace? No HR, no producers, no designers?
(Also dinner party? ...ah March 2015)
The author specifically mentions college friends. Sounds like they were only friends with CS majors even then.
No, nobody else moved to the same city I moved to, so even if I kept up with classmates remotely, it wouldn’t be the same as in-person interactions.
And also no, I never really interact professionally with any of those other roles at my company. And even if I did, they’re still working inside the tech industry, so that’s not really breaking out of the bubble all that much. Plus, I don’t hang out with most people I work with anyways, nor do they hang out with each other.
I’m guessing your experience been quite different?
I live in a non-coastal tech center and have the opposite problem- I love my friends, but almost none of my social circle programs for a living. It would be nice to be able to talk tech more outside of dedicated meetups or hackathons.
Adult softball gives a slightly less diverse in some ways but adds gender diversity. Neither is particularly dangerous among sports. (I’d put them as less risk than hockey or soccer and way less than football.)
You aren’t a slave to your current social setting. For instance, sports. There are far more than football and ultimate. Kind of irrational to stop at 2?
Here’s some help. Sailing. Soccer. Baseball. Softball. Tennis. Golf. Basketball. Table tennis. Badminton. Rock climbing. Bicycling. Trail running. Cricket. Swimming. Diving. Fishing. Roller blading. Dancing. Martial arts. Boxing. Bowling.
The author doesn’t realize that football even at 150lbs is dangerous. Try flag football.
The real problem is lack of rationality.
After college a bunch of lightweight kids from high school would get together and play football. Two straight meetings ending in concussions ended that. We were virtually all less than 150lb.
Have I had a need to choose a sport without keeping that diversity question in mind, I'll probably have ended up with ultimate anyway. Cheap, safe, fun, team spirit - it checks all the boxes for a pragmatic mind
I also went to a dancing school for a year, but I hardly saw any programmer there.
I also like snowboarding but it's hard to interact with people around you so I don't know.
Outside of sports, I like board games and there are more programmers than average.
I also know several teachers who rock climb though of course there are plenty of techies too.
Also ... start a family.
A good team will organize the ocasional drinking/get together, parties, etc...
you don't have to go to church to meet different set of folks
Maybe they don't tell you. For instance, my grandmother didn't believe in god but was culturally attached to the catholic church and traditions. It's quite common (at least in western Europe where I live)
Community does not require religion. But community does require two things that are intrinsic to religion: ritual, and shared experiences.
Also putting the teaching into practice, by feeding the hungry, visiting the sick, welcoming strangers into your home (CouchSurfing/BeWelcome).
I analysed my Facebook Likes, and drew some symbols of the things I enjoy. Some of them have plenty of geeks (hardware, software, education, games), others do not (travel/environment, NGOs, music concerts, church). There are common-interest groups beyond sports.
It's a good advice, but non-believers would have a hard time joining a church. As an atheist European living in NYC, I attended a couple of religious meetings (I was dragged there by a friend and thought it would be interesting).
It was interesting indeed. I can definitely see the value of these meetings. I got to meet new people from different fields and areas, but I couldn't just pretend I shared their religious values.
I think the bias here is the opposite: the author is politically biased to believe this “classism struggle” somehow doesn’t enable manual Labors to play sports?
I think the author should visit the developing world more frequently to realize how common futbol is here, for example.
I’ve been invited to pickup futbol (soccer) games in Mexico and Panama. From what I can tell, it’s a sport played around the world, including in the poorest parts of Africa, Asia, and Latin America.
This is all too frequent—- a politically biased author is unable to face their own biases and instead attempts to enforce them?
Yes, there are socioeconomic differences between world regions. But that doesn’t preclude people from enjoying sports.
Not everything is a consequence of neomarxist political thought. Perhaps explore the world, before making biased presuppositions, author.
It's funny coz statistically speaking these "manual laborers" are likely to kick the author's ass in whatever sport he wants to do for leisure.