A lot of these are simply private places that prohibit photography -- it doesn't make sense to say the place itself is copyrighted since the term copyright refers to the right to make a reproduction a work, not a physical location.

Additionally this really seems like a list of places or things that iStockPhoto won't allow as sources for royalty free images, which is even more narrow.

In the US it's legal to take photos anywhere in public, even federal buildings, and there have been several cases establishing this right:

http://lens.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/01/27/see-officer-i-can-t...