The thing I wanted to bring attention to is the author said the phone's memory was 64GB, expandable to 400GB with a MicroSD card. He should be using the word storage. Phone adverts should be using the word storage. The technical specs pages on the phone manufacturer should be using the word storage. Phone reviewers should be using the word storage and not memory, because they aren't talking about Random Access Memory (RAM).
Amount of RAM is the only spec for phones sold today that indicate whether or not it can be responsive while running both Chrome, Facebook, and GPS simultaneously. If every mobile phone sold on earth was like the Fairphone, then this would be the one deciding factor for me - and it's a detail, that for some absurd reason, is ommited from the article.