Winklevoss Twins Ask for New Hearing in Facebook Case
bits.blogs.nytimes.com
bits.blogs.nytimes.com
Furthermore, they would have much more fulfilling lives if they took the money they have and invested in/ created something new... at least they would have a chance to intellectually participate in the start up environment.
I suspect they are tainted at this point, regardless if they are right or wrong.
They can change how people view them moving forward, but for some odd reason, they keep digging a deep and deeper hole for their reputation.
What's the difference in $ value that they're trying to get? And is the difference between that and the money they originally settled on really worth the damage to their personal brand? They can't possibly be winning in the court of public opinion either right?