Researchers show how to transform materials using a finely shaped laser pulse
quantamagazine.org
quantamagazine.org
It sounds like practical applications are still more or less theoretical, though.
Is there really a difference? Isn't the name we give a material essentially just a shorthand for describing a pattern of behavior that its constituent particles are (mostly) adhering to?
This article does not describe that level of transformation. Rather it's about making "lead behave like gold" as a material, but not as a lustrous metal of ravenous hording.
At the moment we're up to the stage of having a theoretical framework for how to manipulate a given property through a driving field, along with some computational demonstrations that the method works. The major point is that the equations one derives from this method are quite broadly applicable, and generally speaking if you can show they work in silico, then a real-world implementation shouldn't be too far behind.
A further way of looking at it would be as "4 dimensional holography". A regular 3D hologram is static in time, but these ones are effectively "holographic movies", with atomic scale time resolution?
I also wonder if the material doesn't need to be one-atom thick for these tricks to work.
(Perhaps this may help to induce electron capture https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electron_capture ???)
Artificially, one that works with probably most/all lasers would be an active phosphor display(I forget the specific cocktail it's composed of), like the kind from an oscilloscope
There's only a limited quantity of gold on earth so its value is more practical than any digital cryptocurrency as far as stability goes. Not that the current world economy cares a lot about stability though, as many economies use inflation compared to other currencies to maintain growth and take a certain spot in worldwide trade.
The platinum process seems interesting, any link/name about that?
"Gold can currently be manufactured in a nuclear reactor by the irradiation of either platinum or mercury"
Not much in the way of details, unfortunately. The sources might be a good place to look for more.
[...]
>"For a quantum mechanical system, the equivalent is to know how its quantum wave function evolves in time, which is determined by a mathematical function called the Hamiltonian. And there’s the rub — in all but the simplest systems, such as a hydrogen atom, the Hamiltonian becomes too complicated for researchers to calculate the dynamics of the wave function exactly."
In the absence of that knowledge — needed to calculate in advance what control pulse you need — the only alternative seemed to be trial and error: trying out some initial control pulse and then iterating it by running the same experiment again and again."
PDS: Take out the word "quantum" above.
Now, think about what we're dealing with as a system of multiple waves, multiple frequencies, except that we can't see them or have any other way of knowing what they are.
A "black box" of multiple waves, at multiple frequencies, in other words.
There's nothing quantum or magical about a system like that.
It's just a system where the input to get the output we want cannot be pre-determined, because we cannot know the exact state of a system at a given instant of time.
(Hey, sounds a lot like the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle -- "we cannot measure the position (x) and the momentum (p) of a particle with absolute precision. The more accurately we know one of these values, the less accurately we know the other." I wonder if there's a relationship there?
Intuitively, my mind tells me that anything that science calls a "particle" today -- is really just the instantaneous snapshot of a wave packet of multiple waves at multiple frequencies, and this is why, and that the science of tomorrow -- will completely acknowledge this...).
So if we can't know ahead of time how to modify a system of waves to our liking, we have to experiment, use trial-and-error, and repetition, to have any hope of engineering the output to our liking... as is exactly true with any black box system...
But, getting back to a system of multiple waves, this gets into some other topic/problem areas around this subject...
Such as, how a wave can be used to read the vibration/oscillation/frequency of another wave, how that can be done in a system of many such simultaneously oscillating waves, fourier analysis, and how small can a process like that be scaled to, and what's the maximum frequency of waves that a process like that can be scaled to, etc., etc.
Which actually brings us back to "the collapse of the wave function"... (Could a wave A, given a wave B, collapse wave B's wave function? Then (if that gets solved), could a wave A given a series of waves (a wave system) collapse the wave function of that entire series/system of waves? Questions related to this area include such things as "how do you speed a wave up", "how do you slow a wave down", and things like the phenomenon of how strobe lights at the proper frequency can apparently "slow things" down, even "reverse" them (i.e., rotating fan blades)...)
When science reaches the point where we can read (and subsequently write/modify) any wave, at any frequency, at any distance, in any system of waves (without destructively interfering with all of the others) -- then we'll be at the borderline between a scientific civilization, and a magical one...
Perhaps today's quantum computers are early foray into this future knowledge and the possibilities it might hold...
"Any science sufficiently advanced is indistinguishable from magic"
-Arthur C. Clarke
To answer your question: no.
Iff this laser trickery worked permanently, then you'd basically have a prototype Star Trek replicator right there. Feed garbage in, out comes something useful.
If the laser trickery worked temporarily (say, on the timescales of minutes), then perhaps this could be a small step towards creating Star Trek style holograms. Vent inert gas in, reshape it into interesting stuff, pulse it up from time to time to keep it from decaying.
Though I imagine sensory and computational requirements of such a thing would hit the limit of what's physically possible in our universe.
The Second Law of Thermodynamics would like to see you after class.
As long as you keep your garbage under billions on constantly active perfectly timed lasers, it works!