Hacker News Reader

> as he actively tells people to directly go to non-https, that shouldn't be an issue for his audience

Actually it should be but they are uneducated.

> if you're so concerned you can mirror his content to a https site.

That is a poor attitude. In a scenario where that fixed things it would only fix them for one person.

> Actually it should be but they are uneducated.

Or maybe they are educated and they realise it is a non-issue and not worth the effort to put into.

> That is a poor attitude. In a scenario where that fixed things it would only fix them for one person.

No it isn't, it would benefit anyone who cares about that specific issue, you can host it on a secure webpage if you care so much about it.

I think both our premises differ so much this conversation can't continue.