In either case I can’t see how this simply doesn’t point at mismanagement by Hooked. From any angle, they created an environment that made these guys think “my time will be better spent at Apple”.
In either case I can’t see how this simply doesn’t point at mismanagement by Hooked. From any angle, they created an environment that made these guys think “my time will be better spent at Apple”.
tbf I don't think many startups running out of cash and exit opportunities would expect to keep their engineers if Apple approached them to offer a pay rise, regardless of how wonderful the environment was.
But the idea to raise capital by 'selling' engineers to Apple instead of agreeing to the aquihire (and perhaps negotiating for the IP Apple didn't want to be spun out) looks naive. Surely this is one where the investors and advisors ought to have stepped in?
The CEO apparently firing a CTO for interviewing for a job isn't a great look for management either...
The “finders fee” response from Apple was the best they could expect.
And yeah then I read about firing the CTO and the lawsuit and I started to get a picture of what this company was like.
I hope they lose, and good luck to the employees at Apple
Well, this is an appeal court decision, so they have already lost, appealed, and got a confirmation that they lost.