It can also function as a client for Discord. A shame that it is closed-source though.
It can also function as a client for Discord. A shame that it is closed-source though.
If you have to use Slack for work that's one thing. But people chosing to use Discord is just sad and unfortunate. It's just another Facebook situation wherein they are the product and in a few years it'll become unignorable.
Slack is less obvious. Slack boils the frog like they did with IRC bridges and has weird nationalistic restrictions re: USA enemies wherein, say, if the client was developed in Iran then it'll get banned. But it's a lot better odds than Discord where no third party clients are allowed specifically.
Er, no, they aren't. Ripcord is 4 years old. I have no idea what you're talking about.
> Slack boils the frog like they did with IRC bridges and has weird nationalistic restrictions re: USA enemies wherein
Uhhhh
> But it's a lot better odds than Discord where no third party clients are allowed specifically.
Nope, this isn't listed anywhere in their rules.
In particular if your slack channels are heavy users of actions then you'll have problems - the buttons often don't work and the layouts are messed up.
On the plus side it doesn't animate anything, which is a huge win.
In OP's context you're also using a Qt application of macos, which is as much a match made in heaven as using x11 applications on macos (very much not).
Shareware was about leveraging the now defunct sneakernet via physical medium such as floppies and making it ok to copy software and give it to friends on the premise people who like it will feel morally obligated to pay a modest fee.
The second part is still there but the first part is dead, long dead.
I feel like you need to push this social capital and exchange back into the model somehow to bring it forward but not through nagware or review feelers. Something more real and unprompted