> Similarly, when Facebook wanted to inform its users that 30% of the fees users were paying for online events went to Apple, Apple didn’t let Facebook do it saying this information was (once more) “irrelevant”.

That's the passage I meant. I wouldn't have imagined that Apple would be in the capacity of letting or not letting Facebook do something.

On a separate note, you seem to have replied to pretty much everyone in this thread, may I ask why?